Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 185

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Photosynthesis, Water Relations, and Drought Adaptation in Six Woody Species of Oak-Hickory Forests in Central Missouri

Open access
Bahari, Z. A., Pallardy, S. G., Parker, W. C.·1985·Forest Science

Abstract

Responses of photosynthesis, leaf conductance, water potential, and tissue water relations to drought were compared during two growing seasons for saplings of six woody species that occupy natural habitats of varying soil moisture regime. Drought substantially restricted leaf conductance in all angiosperm species ( Quercus velutina, Q. alba, Q. rubra, Cornus florida , and Acer saccharum ), but only slightly reduced conductance of Juniperus virginiana . Cornus florida exhibited the most accentuated response to drought because of its inability to avoid low water potential, a situation attributable to the known shallow rooting habit of this species. Differences in drought adaptation among angiosperms were apparent, with Quercus species exhibiting generally lower osmotic potentials at full turgor and turgor loss point, higher moduli of leaf tissue elasticity, and higher rates of photosynthesis under drought compared with A. saccharum and C. florida . These characteristics would confer a competitive growth advantage to the oaks on dry sites. Juniperus virginiana , a species usually found on very xeric sites, exhibited a very different, but no less effective, pattern of drought adaptation. An inherently low capacity for water loss and the ability to sustain stomatal opening at low water potentials appear to promote the success of this species in dry environments. Forest Sci. 31:557-569.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/forestscience/31.3.557

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Metadata

Authors
Bahari, Z. A., Pallardy, S. G., & Parker, W. C.
Venue
Forest Science
Published
1985-09-01
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
557-569
ISSN
  • 0015-749X (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-3738
OpenAlex
W101890865
Cited by
185
References
0
FWCI
5.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.