The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparative Genomics of the Odorant-Binding and Chemosensory Protein Gene Families across the Arthropoda: Origin and Evolutionary History of the Chemosensory System
Open accessAbstract
Chemoreception is a biological process essential for the survival of animals, as it allows the recognition of important volatile cues for the detection of food, egg-laying substrates, mates, or predators, among other purposes. Furthermore, its role in pheromone detection may contribute to evolutionary processes, such as reproductive isolation and speciation. This key role in several vital biological processes makes chemoreception a particularly interesting system for studying the role of natural selection in molecular adaptation. Two major gene families are involved in the perireceptor events of the chemosensory system: the odorant-binding protein (OBP) and chemosensory protein (CSP) families. Here, we have conducted an exhaustive comparative genomic analysis of these gene families in 20 Arthropoda species. We show that the evolution of the OBP and CSP gene families is highly dynamic, with a high number of gains and losses of genes, pseudogenes, and independent origins of subfamilies. Taken together, our data clearly support the birth-and-death model for the evolution of these gene families with an overall high gene turnover rate. Moreover, we show that the genome organization of the two families is significantly more clustered than expected by chance and, more important, that this pattern appears to be actively maintained across the Drosophila phylogeny. Finally, we suggest the homologous nature of the OBP and CSP gene families, dating back their most recent common ancestor after the terrestrialization of Arthropoda (380--450 Ma) and we propose a scenario for the origin and diversification of these families.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs
Altschul, S. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · Cited by 73,302
Berman, H. M. (2000) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · Cited by 40,196
MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) Software Version 4.0
Tamura, K., Dudley, J., Nei, M., & Kumar, S. (2007) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msm092 · Cited by 28,730
RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models
Stamatakis, A. (2006) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446 · Cited by 15,582
The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences
Jones, D. T., Taylor, W. R., & Thornton, J. M. (1992) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/8.3.275 · Cited by 6,947
MAFFT version 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment
Katoh, K. (2005) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gki198 · Cited by 4,837
The PSIPRED protein structure prediction server
McGuffin, L. J., Bryson, K., & Jones, D. T. (2000) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/16.4.404 · Cited by 3,838
Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL): an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation
Letunic, I., & Bork, P. (2007) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl529 · Cited by 3,299
Artemis: sequence visualization and annotation
Rutherford, K., Parkhill, J., Crook, J., Horsnell, T., Rice, P., Rajandream, M.-A., & Barrell, B. (2000) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/16.10.944 · Cited by 3,078
Automated generation of heuristics for biological sequence comparison
Slater, G. S. C., & Birney, E. (2005) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-6-31 · Cited by 2,933
Cited by
Chipman, A. D., Ferrier, D. E. K., Brena, C., Qu, J., Hughes, D. S. T., Schröder, R., Torres-Oliva, M., Znassi, N., Jiang, H., Almeida, F. C., et al. (2014) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002005 · Cited by 295
Self-citationZheng, Q., Gao, N., Sun, Q., Li, X., Wang, Y., & Xiao, H. (2021) · PLOS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1009947 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Vieira, F. G., & Rozas, J.
- Venue
- Genome Biology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-01-01
- Volume
- 3
- Pages
- 476-490
- ISSN
- 1759-6653 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2118040936
- Cited by
- 502
- References
- 82
- FWCI
- 8.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative Genomics of the Odorant-Binding and Chemosensory Protein Gene Families across the Arthropoda: Origin and Evolutionary History of the Chemosensory System. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/gbe/evr033
- The paper
- Vieira, F. G., & Rozas, J. (2011). Comparative Genomics of the Odorant-Binding and Chemosensory Protein Gene Families across the Arthropoda: Origin and Evolutionary History of the Chemosensory System. Genome Biology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evr033
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.