The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MEASURING GENE FLOW AMONG POPULATIONS HAVING HIGH LEVELS OF GENETIC FRAGMENTATION
Open accessAbstract
We present an analysis of the genetic structures of 22 species of salamanders, with regard to levels of gene flow among populations. We estimate the gene flow parameter, Nm (the product of the effective population number and rate of migration among populations) using two alternative methods described by Wright and Slatkin. For most species, these two methods give approximately congruent estimates of Nm; when estimates differ, the method of Wright produces values slightly larger than those derived by the method of Slatkin. We analyze these results in light of independently derived historical inferences of the fragmentation of populations. This analysis suggests that the Nm values calculated from protein polymorphisms may contain information more relevant to historical patterns of gene exchange than to the current population dynamics; moderately large values of Nm may be calculated for species containing populations known to be no longer exchanging genes. Application of a method for estimating the maximum possible rate of gene exchange among populations indicates that, for most species studied here, gene flow among populations probably is no greater than the mutation rate. We suggest that most plethodontid species cannot be viewed as units whose cohesion is maintained by continuing gene exchange. Furthermore, we suggest that phenotypic uniformity among populations is not easily explained by hypotheses of continual stabilizing selection and propose that future work concentrate upon clarification of the genetic and epigenetic factors conferring self-maintenance or autopoietic properties on living systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mayr, E. (1963) · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674865327 · Cited by 10,175
Cited by
Dispersal, Gene Flow, and Population Structure
Bohonak, A. J. (1999) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/392950 · Cited by 1,253
Applications of mitochondrial DNA analysis in conservation: a critical review
MORITZ, C. (1994) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.1994.tb00080.x · Cited by 787
Genetic estimates of population structure and gene flow: Limitations, lessons and new directions
Bossart, J. L., & Pashley Prowell, D. (1998) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(97)01284-6 · Cited by 548
DOES NICHE CONSERVATISM PROMOTE SPECIATION? A CASE STUDY IN NORTH AMERICAN SALAMANDERS
Kozak, K. H., & Wiens, J. (2006) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb01893.x · Cited by 507
FUNK, W. C., BLOUIN, M. S., CORN, P. S., MAXELL, B. A., PILLIOD, D. S., AMISH, S., & ALLENDORF, F. W. (2005) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2005.02426.x · Cited by 346
Metadata
- Authors
- Larson, A., Wake, D. B., & Yanev, K. P.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1984-02-01
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 293-308
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W1937363610
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MEASURING GENE FLOW AMONG POPULATIONS HAVING HIGH LEVELS OF GENETIC FRAGMENTATION. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/genetics/106.2.293
- The paper
- Larson, A., Wake, D. B., & Yanev, K. P. (1984). MEASURING GENE FLOW AMONG POPULATIONS HAVING HIGH LEVELS OF GENETIC FRAGMENTATION. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/106.2.293
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.