The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Applications of mitochondrial DNA analysis in conservation: a critical review
Abstract
Patterns of variation in mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) increasingly are being investigated in threatened or managed species, but not always with clearly defined goals for conservation. In this review I identify uses of mtDNA analysis which fall into two different areas: (i) ‘gene conservation’ ‐ the identification and management of genetic diversity, and (ii) ‘molecular ecology’ ‐ the use of mtDNA variation to guide and assist demographic studies of populations. These two classes of application have different conceptual bases, conservation goals and time‐frames. Gene conservation makes extensive use of phylogenetic information and is, in general, most relevant to long‐term planning. Appropriate uses here include identification of Evolutionarily Significant Units and assessment of conservation priority of taxa or areas from an evolutionary perspective. Less appropriate are inferences about fitness from within‐population diversity and about species boundaries. Molecular ecology makes more use of allele frequencies and provides information useful for short‐term management of populations. Powerful applications are to identify Management Units and to define and use naturally occurring genetic tags. Estimating demographic parameters, e.g migration rate and population size, from patterns of mtDNA diversity is fraught with difficulty, particularly where populations are fluctuating, and is unlikely to produce quantitative estimates sufficiently accurate to be useful for practical management of contemporary populations. However, through comparative studies, mtDNA analysis can provide qualitative signals of population changes, allowing efficient targeting of resource‐intensive ecological studies. Thus, there are some relatively straightforward uses of mtDNA, preferably in conjunction with assays of nuclear variation, that can make a significant contribution to the long‐term planning and short‐term execution of species recovery plans.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Body size, metabolic rate, generation time, and the molecular clock.
Martin, A. P., & Palumbi, S. R. (1993) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.90.9.4087 · Cited by 1,239
Cited by
DNA markers reveal the complexity of livestock domestication
Bruford, M. W., Bradley, D. G., & Luikart, G. (2003) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1203 · Cited by 599
Quantifying Temporal Genomic Erosion in Endangered Species
Díez-del-Molino, D., Sánchez-Barreiro, F., Barnes, I., Gilbert, M. T. P., & Dalén, L. (2018) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2017.12.002 · Cited by 258
Ellenberg, U., Mattern, T., & Seddon, P. J. (2009) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.09.021 · Cited by 128
Near-complete phylogeny of extant Crocodylia (Reptilia) using mitogenome-based data
Pan, T., Miao, J.-S., Zhang, H.-B., Yan, P., Lee, P.-S., Jiang, X.-Y., Ouyang, J.-H., Deng, Y.-P., Zhang, B.-W., & Wu, X.-B. (2021) · Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1093/zoolinnean/zlaa074 · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- MORITZ, C.
- Venue
- Molecular Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-08
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 401-411
- ISSN
- 0962-1083 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-294X
- OpenAlex
- W2122286614
- Cited by
- 787
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Applications of mitochondrial DNA analysis in conservation: a critical review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-294x.1994.tb00080.x
- The paper
- MORITZ, C. (1994). Applications of mitochondrial DNA analysis in conservation: a critical review. Molecular Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294x.1994.tb00080.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.