The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Gametic Disequilibrium Measures: Proceed With Caution
Abstract
Five different measures of gametic disequilibrium in current use and a new one based on R. C. Lewontin's D′, are examined and compared. All of them, except the measure based on Lewontin's D′, are highly dependent upon allelic frequencies, including four measures that are normalized in some manner. In addition, the measures suggested by A. H. D. Brown, M. F. Feldman and E. Nevo, and T. Ohta can have negative values when there is maximum disequilibrium and have rates of decay in infinite populations that are a function of the initial gametic array. The variances were large for all the measures in samples taken from populations at equilibrium under neutrality, with the measure based on D′ having the lowest variance. In these samples, three of the measures were highly correlated, D2, D* (equal to the correlation coefficient when there are two alleles at each locus) and the measure X(2) of Brown et al. Using frequency-dependent measures may result in mistaken conclusions, a fact illustrated by discussion of studies inferring recombinational hot spots and the effects of population bottlenecks from disequilibrium values.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
High-resolution haplotype structure in the human genome
Daly, M. J., Rioux, J. D., Schaffner, S. F., Hudson, T. J., & Lander, E. S. (2001) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1001-229 · Cited by 1,717
Linkage disequilibrium--understanding the evolutionary past and mapping the medical future.
Slatkin, M. (2008) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2361 · Cited by 1,614
Structure of linkage disequilibrium and phenotypic associations in the maize genome
Remington, D. L., Thornsberry, J. M., Matsuoka, Y., Wilson, L. M., Whitt, S. R., Doebley, J., Kresovich, S., Goodman, M. M., & Buckler, E. S. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.201394398 · Cited by 1,256
Waples, R. S., & Do, C. (2010) · Evolutionary Applications · doi:10.1111/j.1752-4571.2009.00104.x · Cited by 991
RECOMBINATION AND THE MULTILOCUS STRUCTURE OF FUNGAL POPULATIONS
Milgroom, M. G. (1996) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.34.1.457 · Cited by 549
Metadata
- Authors
- Hedrick, P. W.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1987-10-01
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 331-341
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W1826574233
- Cited by
- 924
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gametic Disequilibrium Measures: Proceed With Caution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/genetics/117.2.331
- The paper
- Hedrick, P. W. (1987). Gametic Disequilibrium Measures: Proceed With Caution. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/117.2.331
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.