The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Structure of linkage disequilibrium and phenotypic associations in the maize genome
Open accessAbstract
Association studies based on linkage disequilibrium (LD) can provide high resolution for identifying genes that may contribute to phenotypic variation. We report patterns of local and genome-wide LD in 102 maize inbred lines representing much of the worldwide genetic diversity used in maize breeding, and address its implications for association studies in maize. In a survey of six genes, we found that intragenic LD generally declined rapidly with distance ( r 2 < 0.1 within 1500 bp), but rates of decline were highly variable among genes. This rapid decline probably reflects large effective population sizes in maize during its evolution and high levels of recombination within genes. A set of 47 simple sequence repeat (SSR) loci showed stronger evidence of genome-wide LD than did single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in candidate genes. LD was greatly reduced but not eliminated by grouping lines into three empirically determined subpopulations. SSR data also supplied evidence that divergent artificial selection on flowering time may have played a role in generating population structure. Provided the effects of population structure are effectively controlled, this research suggests that association studies show great promise for identifying the genetic basis of important traits in maize with very high resolution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The limits of selection during maize domestication
Wang, R.-L., Stec, A., Hey, J., Lukens, L., & Doebley, J. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/18435 · Cited by 740
Self-citation
Cited by
Association mapping: critical considerations shift from genotyping to experimental design
Myles, S., Peiffer, J., Brown, P. J., Ersoz, E. S., Zhang, Z., Costich, D. E., & Buckler, E. S. (2009) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.109.068437 · Cited by 857
Self-citationAndersen, J. R., & Lübberstedt, T. (2003) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2003.09.010 · Cited by 796
A major locus controls local adaptation and adaptive life history variation in a perennial plant
Wang, J., Ding, J., Tan, B., Robinson, K. M., Michelson, I. H., Johansson, A., Nystedt, B., Scofield, D. G., Nilsson, O., Jansson, S., et al. (2018) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-018-1444-y · Cited by 145
Megabase-scale inversion polymorphism in the wild ancestor of maize
Fang, Z., Pyhäjärvi, T., Weber, A. L., Dawe, R. K., Glaubitz, J. C., González, J. D. J. S., Ross-Ibarra, C., Doebley, J., Morrell, P. L., & Ross-Ibarra, J. (2012) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.112.138578 · Cited by 104
Self-citationA PRDX1 mutant allele causes a MMACHC secondary epimutation in cblC patients
Guéant, J.-L., Chéry, C., Oussalah, A., Nadaf, J., Coelho, D., Josse, T., Flayac, J., Robert, A., Koscinski, I., Gastin, I., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-02306-5 · Cited by 93
Metadata
- Authors
- Remington, D. L., Thornsberry, J. M., Matsuoka, Y., Wilson, L. M., Whitt, S. R., Doebley, J., Kresovich, S., Goodman, M. M., & Buckler, E. S.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2001-09-18
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 11479-11484
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2061549418
- Cited by
- 1,256
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Structure of linkage disequilibrium and phenotypic associations in the maize genome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.201394398
- The paper
- Remington, D. L., Thornsberry, J. M., Matsuoka, Y., Wilson, L. M., Whitt, S. R., Doebley, J., Kresovich, S., Goodman, M. M., & Buckler, E. S. (2001). Structure of linkage disequilibrium and phenotypic associations in the maize genome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.201394398
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.