The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genetic control of intrachromosomal recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. I. Isolation and genetic characterization of hyper-recombination mutations.
Abstract
Eight complementation groups have been defined for recessive mutations conferring an increased mitotic intrachromosomal recombination phenotype (hpr genes) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Some of the mutations preferentially increase intrachromosomal gene conversion (hpr4, hpr5 and hpr8) between repeated sequences, some increase loss of a marker between duplicated genes (hpr1 and hpr6), and some increase both types of events (hpr2, hpr3 and hpr7). New alleles of the CDC2 and CDC17 genes were recovered among these mutants. The mutants were also characterized for sensitivity to DNA damaging agents and for mutator activity. Among the more interesting mutants are hpr5, which shows a biased gene conversion in a leu2-112::URA3::leu2-k duplication; and hpr1, which has a much weaker effect on interchromosomal mitotic recombination than on intrachromosomal mitotic recombination. These analyses suggest that gene conversion and reciprocal exchange can be separated mutationally. Further studies are required to show whether different recombination pathways or different outcomes of the same recombination pathway are controlled by the genes identified in this study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The distribution of the numbers of mutants in bacterial populations
Lea, D. E., & Coulson, C. A. (1949) · Journal of Genetics · doi:10.1007/bf02986080 · Cited by 1,450
Gene conversion: some implications for immunoglobulin genes
Baltimore, D. (1981) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(81)90082-9 · Cited by 486
Cited by
Multiple Pathways of Recombination Induced by Double-Strand Breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Pâques, F., & Haber, J. E. (1999) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.63.2.349-404.1999 · Cited by 2,120
The Srs2 helicase prevents recombination by disrupting Rad51 nucleoprotein filaments
Veaute, X., Jeusset, J., Soustelle, C., Kowalczykowski, S. C., Le Cam, E., & Fabre, F. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01585 · Cited by 621
Srs2 and Sgs1–Top3 Suppress Crossovers during Double-Strand Break Repair in Yeast
Ira, G., Malkova, A., Liberi, G., Foiani, M., & Haber, J. E. (2003) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00886-9 · Cited by 571
Crosstalk between SUMO and Ubiquitin on PCNA Is Mediated by Recruitment of the Helicase Srs2p
Papouli, E., Chen, S., Davies, A. A., Huttner, D., Krejci, L., Sung, P., & Ulrich, H. D. (2005) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2005.06.001 · Cited by 522
Aguilera, A., & García-Muse, T. (2013) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-111212-133232 · Cited by 476
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Aguilera, A., & Klein, H. L.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1988-08-01
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 779-790
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W2166248803
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 1.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genetic control of intrachromosomal recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. I. Isolation and genetic characterization of hyper-recombination mutations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/genetics/119.4.779
- The paper
- Aguilera, A., & Klein, H. L. (1988). Genetic control of intrachromosomal recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. I. Isolation and genetic characterization of hyper-recombination mutations. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/119.4.779
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.