The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Factors affecting the distribution of cytoplasmic incompatibility in Drosophila simulans.
Open accessAbstract
In Drosophila simulans a Wolbachia-like microorganism is responsible for reduced egg-hatch when infected males mate with uninfected females. Both incompatibility types have previously been found in North America, Europe and Africa. Some California populations have remained polymorphic for over two years, and the infection is apparently spreading in central California. Egg hatch proportions for wild-caught females from polymorphic populations show that the incompatibility system acts in nature, but egg mortality rates are apparently lower than observed in laboratory populations. Although infected females maintained under various laboratory conditions never produce uninfected offspring, some wild-caught infected females produce both infected and uninfected progeny. This helps explain the persistence of a low frequency of uninfected flies in predominantly infected populations and may also explain the other polymorphisms observed. Fitness comparisons of infected and uninfected stocks, including both larval and adult fitness components, indicate that fecundity may be the component most affected. Infected females suffer a fecundity reduction of 10-20% in the laboratory, but the reduction seems to be smaller in nature. A theoretical analysis provides some insight into the population biology of the infection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Ecology and Evolution of Microbes that Manipulate Host Reproduction
Engelstädter, J., & Hurst, G. D. D. (2009) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120206 · Cited by 555
Wolbachia Establishment and Invasion in an Aedes aegypti Laboratory Population
Xi, Z., Khoo, C. C. H., & Dobson, S. L. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1117607 · Cited by 554
Wolbachia endosymbionts responsible for various alterations of sexuality in arthropods
(1992) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1992.0135 · Cited by 470
From Parasite to Mutualist: Rapid Evolution of Wolbachia in Natural Populations of Drosophila
Weeks, A. R., Turelli, M., Harcombe, W. R., Reynolds, K. T., & Hoffmann, A. A. (2007) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050114 · Cited by 447
Self-citationLimited Dengue Virus Replication in Field-Collected Aedes aegypti Mosquitoes Infected with Wolbachia
Frentiu, F. D., Zakir, T., Walker, T., Popovici, J., Pyke, A. T., van den Hurk, A., McGraw, E. A., & O'Neill, S. L. (2014) · PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases · doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0002688 · Cited by 344
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoffmann, A. A., Turelli, M., & Harshman, L. G.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1990-12-01
- Volume
- 126
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 933-948
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W1914280725
- Cited by
- 450
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Factors affecting the distribution of cytoplasmic incompatibility in Drosophila simulans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/genetics/126.4.933
- The paper
- Hoffmann, A. A., Turelli, M., & Harshman, L. G. (1990). Factors affecting the distribution of cytoplasmic incompatibility in Drosophila simulans. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/126.4.933
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.