The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genetic analysis of chemosensory control of dauer formation in Caenorhabditis elegans.
Open accessAbstract
Dauer larva formation in Caenorhabditis elegans is controlled by chemosensory cells that respond to environmental cues. Genetic interactions among mutations in 23 genes that affect dauer larva formation were investigated. Mutations in seven genes that cause constitutive dauer formation, and mutations in 16 genes that either block dauer formation or result in the formation of abnormal dauers, were analyzed. Double mutants between dauer-constitutive and dauer-defective mutations were constructed and characterized for their capacity to form dauer larvae. Many of the genes could be interpreted to lie in a simple linear epistasis pathway. Three genes, daf-16, daf-18 and daf-20, may affect downstream steps in a branched part of the pathway. Three other genes, daf-2, daf-3 and daf-5, displayed partial or complex epistasis interactions that were difficult to interpret as part of a simple linear pathway. Dauer-defective mutations in nine genes cause structurally defective chemosensory cilia, thereby blocking chemosensation. Mutations in all nine of these genes appear to fall at a single step in the epistasis pathway. Dauer-constitutive mutations in one gene, daf-11, were strongly suppressed for dauer formation by mutations in the nine cilium-structure genes. Mutations in the other six dauer-constitutive genes caused dauer formation despite the absence of functional chemosensory endings. These results suggest that daf-11 is directly involved in chemosensory transduction essential for dauer formation, while the other Daf-c genes play roles downstream of the chemosensory step.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The structure of the nervous system of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans
White, J. G., Southgate, E., Thomson, J. N., & Brenner, S. (1986) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1986.0056 · Cited by 5,589
Cited by
A C. elegans mutant that lives twice as long as wild type
Kenyon, C., Chang, J., Gensch, E., Rudner, A., & Tabtiang, R. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/366461a0 · Cited by 3,387
Regulation of lifespan in Drosophila by modulation of genes in the TOR signaling pathway
Kapahi, P., Zid, B. M., Harper, T., Koslover, D., Sapin, V., & Benzer, S. (2004) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2004.03.059 · Cited by 1,293
Tissue-Specific Activities of C. elegans DAF-16 in the Regulation of Lifespan
Libina, N., Berman, J. R., & Kenyon, C. (2003) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00889-4 · Cited by 820
Garigan, D., Hsu, A.-L., Fraser, A. G., Kamath, R. S., Ahringer, J., & Kenyon, C. (2002) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/161.3.1101 · Cited by 803
Onken, B., & Driscoll, M. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0008758 · Cited by 671
Metadata
- Authors
- Vowels, J. J., & Thomas, J. H.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1992-01-01
- Volume
- 130
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 105-123
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W2106937415
- Cited by
- 349
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genetic analysis of chemosensory control of dauer formation in Caenorhabditis elegans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/genetics/130.1.105
- The paper
- Vowels, J. J., & Thomas, J. H. (1992). Genetic analysis of chemosensory control of dauer formation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/130.1.105
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.