The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Population genetics of polymorphism and divergence.
Open accessAbstract
Frequencies of mutant sites are modeled as a Poisson random field in two species that share a sufficiently recent common ancestor. The selective effect of the new alleles can be favorable, neutral, or detrimental. The model is applied to the sample configurations of nucleotides in the alcohol dehydrogenase gene (Adh) in Drosophila simulans and Drosophila yakuba. Assuming a synonymous mutation rate of 1.5 x 10(-8) per site per year and 10 generations per year, we obtain estimates for the effective population size (N(e) = 6.5 x 10(6)), the species divergence time (tdiv = 3.74 million years), and an average selection coefficient (sigma = 1.53 x 10(-6) per generation for advantageous or mildly detrimental replacements), although it is conceivable that only two of the amino acid replacements were selected and the rest neutral. The analysis, which includes a sampling theory for the independent infinite sites model with selection, also suggests the estimate that the number of amino acids in the enzyme that are susceptible to favorable mutation is in the range 2-23 at any one time. The approach provides a theoretical basis for the use of a 2 x 2 contingency table to compare fixed differences and polymorphic sites with silent sites and amino acid replacements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Slightly Deleterious Mutant Substitutions in Evolution
OHTA, T. (1973) · Nature · doi:10.1038/246096a0 · Cited by 1,104
Cited by
Initial sequence of the chimpanzee genome and comparison with the human genome
The Chimpanzee Sequencing and Analysis Consortium (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04072 · Cited by 2,459
Gutenkunst, R. N., Hernandez, R. D., Williamson, S. H., & Bustamante, C. D. (2009) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000695 · Cited by 1,906
Molecular Signatures of Natural Selection
Nielsen, R. (2005) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.39.073003.112420 · Cited by 1,641
The Population Genetics of dN/dS
Kryazhimskiy, S., & Plotkin, J. B. (2008) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000304 · Cited by 962
Robust and scalable inference of population history from hundreds of unphased whole genomes
Terhorst, J., Kamm, J. A., & Song, Y. S. (2017) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3748 · Cited by 937
Metadata
- Authors
- Sawyer, S. A., & Hartl, D. L.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1992-12-01
- Volume
- 132
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1161-1176
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W2103844658
- Cited by
- 589
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Population genetics of polymorphism and divergence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/genetics/132.4.1161
- The paper
- Sawyer, S. A., & Hartl, D. L. (1992). Population genetics of polymorphism and divergence. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/132.4.1161
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.