The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Using markers in gene introgression breeding programs.
Open accessAbstract
We investigate the use of markers to hasten the recovery of the recipient genome during an introgression breeding program. The effects of time and intensity of selection, population size, number and position of selected markers are studied for chromosomes either carrying or not carrying the introgressed gene. We show that marker assisted selection may lead to a gain in time of about two generations, an efficiency below previous theoretical predictions. Markers are most useful when their map position is known. In the early generations, it is shown that increasing the number of markers over three per non-carrier chromosome is not efficient, that the segment surrounding the introgressed gene is better controlled by rather distant markers unless high selection intensity can be applied, and that selection on this segment first can reduce the selection intensity available for selection on non-carrier chromosomes. These results are used to propose an optimal strategy for selection on the whole genome, making the most of available material and conditions (e.g., population size and fertility, genetic map).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Efficiency of marker-assisted selection in the improvement of quantitative traits.
Lande, R., & Thompson, R. (1990) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/124.3.743 · Cited by 1,410
Young, N. D., & Tanksley, S. D. (1989) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/bf00305828 · Cited by 438
Stam, P., & Zeven, A. C. (1981) · Euphytica · doi:10.1007/bf00033982 · Cited by 241
DNA fingerprints applied to gene introgression in breeding programs.
Hillel, J., Schaap, T., Haberfeld, A., Jeffreys, A. J., Plotzky, Y., Cahaner, A., & Lavi, U. (1990) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/124.3.783 · Cited by 143
Hanson, W. D. (1959) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/44.5.833 · Cited by 110
Cited by
A marker-assisted backcross approach for developing submergence-tolerant rice cultivars
Neeraja, C. N., Maghirang-Rodriguez, R., Pamplona, A., Heuer, S., Collard, B. C. Y., Septiningsih, E. M., Vergara, G., Sanchez, D., Xu, K., Ismail, A. M., et al. (2007) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-007-0607-0 · Cited by 493
Genetic diversity is indispensable for plant breeding to improve crops
Swarup, S., Cargill, E. J., Crosby, K., Flagel, L., Kniskern, J., & Glenn, K. C. (2021) · Crop Science · doi:10.1002/csc2.20377 · Cited by 423
Application of Genomic Tools in Plant Breeding
M. Perez-de-Castro, A., Vilanova, S., Canizares, J., Pascual, L., M. Blanca, J., J. Diez, M., Prohens, J., & Pico, B. (2012) · Current Genomics · doi:10.2174/138920212800543084 · Cited by 280
Molecular Markers and Marker-Assisted Breeding in Plants
Jiang, G.-L. (2013) · Plant Breeding from Laboratories to Fields · doi:10.5772/52583 · Cited by 278
Association Analysis as a Strategy for Improvement of Quantitative Traits in Plants
Breseghello, F., & Sorrells, M. E. (2006) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci2005.09-0305 · Cited by 276
Metadata
- Authors
- Hospital, F., Chevalet, C., & Mulsant, P.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1992-12-01
- Volume
- 132
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1199-1210
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W1948999301
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 2.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Using markers in gene introgression breeding programs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/genetics/132.4.1199
- The paper
- Hospital, F., Chevalet, C., & Mulsant, P. (1992). Using markers in gene introgression breeding programs. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/132.4.1199
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.