The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How often do duplicated genes evolve new functions?
Open accessAbstract
A recently duplicated gene can either fix a null allele (becoming a pseudogene) or fix an (advantageous) allele giving a slightly different function, starting it on the road to evolving a new function. Here we examine the relative probabilities of these two events under a simple model. Null alleles are assumed to be neutral; linkage effects are ignored, as are unequal crossing over and gene conversion. These assumptions likely make our results underestimates for the probability that an advantageous allele is fixed first. When new advantageous mutations are additive with selection coefficient s and the ratio of advantageous to null mutations is rho, the probability an advantageous allele is fixed first is ([1 - e-s]/[rho S] + 1)-1, where S = 4Nes with Ne the effective population size. The probability that a duplicate locus becomes a pseudogene, as opposed to evolving a new gene function, is high unless rhoS > 1. However, even if advantageous mutations are very rare relative to null mutations, for sufficiently large populations rhoS > 1 and new gene function, rather than pseudogene formation, is the expected fate of most duplicated genes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gilbert, W. (1978) · Nature · doi:10.1038/271501a0 · Cited by 2,300
Cited by
Preservation of Duplicate Genes by Complementary, Degenerative Mutations
Force, A., Lynch, M., Pickett, F. B., Amores, A., Yan, Y.-L., & Postlethwait, J. (1999) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/151.4.1531 · Cited by 3,529
Polyploid incidence and evolution
Otto, S. P., & Whitton, J. (2000) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.34.1.401 · Cited by 2,363
Evolution by gene duplication: An update
Zhang, J. (2003) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(03)00033-8 · Cited by 2,201
The evolution of gene duplications: classifying and distinguishing between models
Innan, H., & Kondrashov, F. (2010) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2689 · Cited by 1,307
Functional Divergence of Duplicated Genes Formed by Polyploidy during Arabidopsis Evolution[W]
Blanc, G., & Wolfe, K. H. (2004) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.021410 · Cited by 1,076
Metadata
- Authors
- Walsh, J. B.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1995-01-01
- Volume
- 139
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 421-428
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W2176302391
- Cited by
- 416
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How often do duplicated genes evolve new functions? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/genetics/139.1.421
- The paper
- Walsh, J. B. (1995). How often do duplicated genes evolve new functions? Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/139.1.421
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.