The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Temperature-sensitive mutations that cause stage-specific defects in Zebrafish fin regeneration.
Open accessAbstract
When amputated, the fins of adult zebrafish rapidly regenerate the missing tissue. Fin regeneration proceeds through several stages, including wound healing, establishment of the wound epithelium, recruitment of the blastema from mesenchymal cells underlying the wound epithelium, and differentiation and outgrowth of the regenerate. We screened for temperature-sensitive mutations that affect the regeneration of the fin. Seven mutations were identified, including five that fail to regenerate their fins, one that causes slow growth during regeneration, and one that causes dysmorphic bumps or tumors to develop in the regenerating fin. reg5 mutants fail to regenerate their caudal fins, whereas reg6 mutants develop dysmorphic bumps in their regenerates at the restrictive temperature. Temperature-shift experiments indicate that reg5 and reg6 affect different stages of regeneration. The critical period for reg5 occurs during the early stages of regeneration before or during establishment of the blastema, resulting in defects in subsequent growth of the blastema and failure to differentiate bone-forming cells. The critical period for reg6 occurs after the onset of bone differentiation and during early stages of regenerative outgrowth. Both reg5 and reg6 also show temperature-sensitive defects in embryonic development or in ontogenetic outgrowth of the juvenile fin.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Organization of hindbrain segments in the zebrafish embryo
Trevarrow, B., Marks, D. L., & Kimmel, C. B. (1990) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/0896-6273(90)90194-k · Cited by 506
Cited by
The zebrafish as a model for complex tissue regeneration
Gemberling, M., Bailey, T. J., Hyde, D. R., & Poss, K. D. (2013) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2013.07.003 · Cited by 566
The art and design of genetic screens: zebrafish
Patton, E. E., & Zon, L. I. (2001) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/35103567 · Cited by 434
Advances in understanding tissue regenerative capacity and mechanisms in animals
Poss, K. D. (2010) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2879 · Cited by 416
Plasticity and reprogramming of differentiated cells in amphibian regeneration
Brockes, J. P., & Kumar, A. (2002) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm881 · Cited by 405
Tales of regeneration in zebrafish
Poss, K. D., Keating, M. T., & Nechiporuk, A. (2003) · Developmental Dynamics · doi:10.1002/dvdy.10220 · Cited by 403
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnson, S. L., & Weston, J. A.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1995-12-01
- Volume
- 141
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1583-1595
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W2059485167
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Temperature-sensitive mutations that cause stage-specific defects in Zebrafish fin regeneration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/genetics/141.4.1583
- The paper
- Johnson, S. L., & Weston, J. A. (1995). Temperature-sensitive mutations that cause stage-specific defects in Zebrafish fin regeneration. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/141.4.1583
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.