The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The pattern of neutral molecular variation under the background selection model.
Open accessAbstract
Stochastic simulations of the infinite sites model were used to study the behavior of genetic diversity at a neutral locus in a genomic region without recombination, but subject to selection against deleterious alleles maintained by recurrent mutation (background selection). In large populations, the effect of background selection on the number of segregating sites approaches the effect on nucleotide site diversity, i.e., the reduction in genetic variability caused by background selection resembles that caused by a simple reduction in effective population size. We examined, by coalescence-based methods, the power of several tests for the departure from neutral expectation of the frequency spectra of alleles in samples from randomly mating populations (Tajima's, Fu and Li's, and Watterson's tests). All of the tests have low power unless the selection against mutant alleles is extremely weak. In Drosophila, significant Tajima's tests are usually not obtained with empirical data sets from loci in genomic regions with restricted recombination frequencies and that exhibit low genetic diversity. This is consistent with the operation of background selection as opposed to selective sweeps. It remains to be decided whether background selection is sufficient to explain the observed extent of reduction in diversity in regions of restricted recombination.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The sequence of the human genome
Venter, J. C., Adams, M. D., Myers, E. W., Li, P. W., Mural, R. J., Sutton, G. G., Smith, H. O., Yandell, M., Evans, C. A., Holt, R. A., et al. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1058040 · Cited by 13,909
Hitchhiking Under Positive Darwinian Selection
Fay, J. C., & Wu, C.-I. (2000) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/155.3.1405 · Cited by 1,819
Population size does not influence mitochondrial genetic diversity in animals.
Bazin, E., Glémin, S., & Galtier, N. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1122033 · Cited by 770
Anisimova, M., Nielsen, R., & Yang, Z. (2003) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/164.3.1229 · Cited by 561
Effects of inbreeding on the genetic diversity of populations
Charlesworth, D. (2003) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2003.1296 · Cited by 466
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Charlesworth, D., Charlesworth, B., & Morgan, M. T.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1995-12-01
- Volume
- 141
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1619-1632
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W1900500601
- Cited by
- 404
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The pattern of neutral molecular variation under the background selection model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/genetics/141.4.1619
- The paper
- Charlesworth, D., Charlesworth, B., & Morgan, M. T. (1995). The pattern of neutral molecular variation under the background selection model. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/141.4.1619
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.