The DOI matches its Crossref record; 158 of the 158 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of inbreeding on the genetic diversity of populations
Open accessAbstract
The study of variability within species is important to all biologists who use genetic markers. Since the discovery of molecular variability among normal individuals, data have been collected from a wide range of organisms, and it is important to understand the major factors affecting diversity levels and patterns. Comparisons of inbreeding and outcrossing populations can contribute to this understanding, and therefore studying plant populations is important, because related species often have different breeding systems. DNA sequence data are now starting to become available from suitable plant and animal populations, to measure and compare variability levels and test predictions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Molecular Evolutionary Genetics
Nei, M. (1987) · Columbia University Press eBooks · doi:10.7312/nei-92038 · Cited by 15,271
Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism.
Tajima, F. (1989) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/123.3.585 · Cited by 13,941
The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution
Kimura, M. (1979) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1179-98 · Cited by 7,666
The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution
Kimura, M. (1983) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511623486 · Cited by 6,347
Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations.
Fu, Y. X., & Li, W. H. (1993) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/133.3.693 · Cited by 4,034
THE GENETIC BASIS OF EVOLUTIONARY CHANGE
Felsenstein, J. (1975) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1975.tb00851.x · Cited by 3,912
THE BOTTLENECK EFFECT AND GENETIC VARIABILITY IN POPULATIONS
Nei, M., Maruyama, T., & Chakraborty, R. (1975) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1975.tb00807.x · Cited by 3,498
Allozyme diversity in plant species
Hamrick, J. L., & Godt, M. J. W. (1990) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,643
Wolfe, K. H., Li, W. H., & Sharp, P. M. (1987) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.84.24.9054 · Cited by 2,317
Effects of life history traits on genetic diversity in plant species
Hamrick, J. L., & Godt, M. J. W. (1996) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1996.0112 · Cited by 2,298
Cited by
RAPID EVOLUTION CAUSED BY POLLINATOR LOSS IN MIMULUS GUTTATUS: RAPID EVOLUTION AFTER POLLINATOR LOSS
Bodbyl Roels, S. A., & Kelly, J. K. (2011) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01326.x · Cited by 203
Genetic Costs of Domestication and Improvement
Moyers, B. T., Morrell, P. L., & McKay, J. K. (2018) · Journal of Heredity · doi:10.1093/jhered/esx069 · Cited by 216
Marchi, N., Mennecier, P., Georges, M., Lafosse, S., Hegay, T., Dorzhu, C., Chichlo, B., Ségurel, L., & Heyer, E. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-27047-3 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Charlesworth, D.
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2003-06-29
- Volume
- 358
- Issue
- 1434
- Pages
- 1051-1070
- ISSN
- 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-2970
- OpenAlex
- W2079823977
- Cited by
- 466
- References
- 158
- FWCI
- 7.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of inbreeding on the genetic diversity of populations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rstb.2003.1296
- The paper
- Charlesworth, D. (2003). Effects of inbreeding on the genetic diversity of populations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2003.1296
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
