The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mitochondrial DNA Analysis of Mongolian Populations and Implications for the Origin of New World Founders
Abstract
High levels of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) diversity were determined for Mongolian populations, represented by the Mongol-speaking Khalkha and Dariganga. Although 103 samples were collected across Mongolia, low levels of genetic substructuring were detected, reflecting the nomadic lifestyle and relatively recent ethnic differentiation of Mongolian populations. mtDNA control region I sequence and seven additional mtDNA polymorphisms were assayed to allow extensive comparison with previous human population studies. Based on a comparative analysis, we propose that indigenous populations in east Central Asia represent the closest genetic link between Old and New World populations. Utilizing restriction/deletion polymorphisms, Mongolian populations were found to carry all four New World founding haplogroups as defined by Wallace and coworkers. The ubiquitous presence of the four New World haplogroups in the Americas but narrow distribution across Asia weakens support for Greenberg and coworkers' theory of New World colonization via three independent migrations. The statistical and geographic scarcity of New World haplogroups in Asia makes it improbable that the same four haplotypes would be drawn from one geographic region three independent times. Instead, it is likely that founder effects manifest throughout Asia and the Americas are responsible for differences in mtDNA haplotype frequencies observed in these regions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Excoffier, L., Smouse, P. E., & Quattro, J. M. (1992) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/131.2.479 · Cited by 13,929
SAMPLING VARIANCES OF HETEROZYGOSITY AND GENETIC DISTANCE
Nei, M., & Roychoudhury, A. K. (1974) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/76.2.379 · Cited by 1,641
Cited by
The emerging tree of West Eurasian mtDNAs: a synthesis of control-region sequences and RFLPs
Macaulay, V., Richards, M., Hickey, E., Vega, E., Cruciani, F., Guida, V., Scozzari, R., Bonné-Tamir, B., Sykes, B., & Torroni, A. (1999) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/302204 · Cited by 602
(1997) · PubMed · Cited by 412
The emerging limbs and twigs of the East Asian mtDNA tree
Kivisild, T., Tolk, H.-V., Parik, J., Wang, Y., Papiha, S. S., Bandelt, H.-J., & Villems, R. (2002) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003996 · Cited by 403
Where west meets east: the complex mtDNA landscape of the southwest and Central Asian corridor
Quintana-Murci, L., Chaix, R., Wells, R. S., Behar, D. M., Sayar, H., Scozzari, R., Rengo, C., Al-Zahery, N., Semino, O., Santachiara-Benerecetti, A. S., et al. (2004) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/383236 · Cited by 338
mtDNA Analysis of a Prehistoric Oneota Population: Implications for the Peopling of the New World
Stone, A. C., & Stoneking, M. (1998) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/301838 · Cited by 287
Metadata
- Authors
- Kolman, C. J., Sambuughin, N., & Bermingham, E.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996-04-01
- Volume
- 142
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1321-1334
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W2161436369
- Cited by
- 337
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.