The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Genetic Distances and Reconstruction of Phylogenetic Trees From Microsatellite DNA
Open accessAbstract
Recently many investigators have used microsatellite DNA loci for studying the evolutionary relationships of closely related populations or species, and some authors proposed new genetic distance measures for this purpose. However, the efficiencies of these distance measures in obtaining the correct tree topology remains unclear. We therefore investigated the probability of obtaining the correct topology (PC) for these new distances as well as traditional distance measures by using computer simulation. We used both the infinite-allele model (IAM) and the stepwise mutation model (SMM), which seem to be appropriate for classical markers and microsatellite loci, respectively. The results show that in both the IAM and SMM Cavalli-Sforza and Edwards' chord distance (Dc) and NEI et al.'s DA distance generally show higher PC values than other distance measures, whether the bottleneck effect exists or not. For estimating evolutionary times, however, NEI'S standard distance and Goldstein et al's (δμ) are more appropriate than other distances. Microsatellite DNA seems to be very useful for clarifying the evolutionary relationships of closely related populations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Genetic Structure and Diversity in Oryza sativa L.
Garris, A. J., Tai, T. H., Coburn, J., Kresovich, S., & McCouch, S. (2005) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.104.035642 · Cited by 1,137
Reconstructing routes of invasion using genetic data: why, how and so what?
ESTOUP, A., & GUILLEMAUD, T. (2010) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2010.04773.x · Cited by 649
Classifying the evolutionary and ecological features of neoplasms
Maley, C. C., Aktipis, A., Graham, T. A., Sottoriva, A., Boddy, A. M., Janiszewska, M., Silva, A. S., Gerlinger, M., Yuan, Y., Pienta, K. J., et al. (2017) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc.2017.69 · Cited by 423
Fine‐scaled geographical population structuring in a highly mobile marine species: the Atlantic cod
Knutsen, H., Jorde, P. E., André, C., & Stenseth, N. C. (2003) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.2003.01750.x · Cited by 370
Chromosome Y microsatellites: population genetic and evolutionary aspects
de Knijff, P., Kayser, M., Caglià, A., Corach, D., Fretwell, N., Gehrig, C., Graziosi, G., Heidorn, F., Herrmann, S., Herzog, B., et al. (1997) · International Journal of Legal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s004140050052 · Cited by 326
Metadata
- Authors
- Takezaki, N., & Nei, M.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996-09-01
- Volume
- 144
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 389-399
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W1882473202
- Cited by
- 1,267
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genetic Distances and Reconstruction of Phylogenetic Trees From Microsatellite DNA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/genetics/144.1.389
- The paper
- Takezaki, N., & Nei, M. (1996). Genetic Distances and Reconstruction of Phylogenetic Trees From Microsatellite DNA. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/144.1.389
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.