The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Description and Power Analysis of Two Tests for Detecting Recent Population Bottlenecks From Allele Frequency Data
Open accessAbstract
When a population experiences a reduction of its effective size, it generally develops a heterozygosity excess at selectively neutral loci, i.e., the heterozygosity computed from a sample of genes is larger than the heterozygosity expected from the number of alleles found in the sample if the population were at mutation drift equilibrium. The heterozygosity excess persists only a certain number of generations until a new equilibrium is established. Two statistical tests for detecting a heterozygosity excess are described. They require measurements of the number of alleles and heterozygosity at each of several loci from a population sample. The first test determines if the proportion of loci with heterozygosity excess is significantly larger than expected at equilibrium. The second test establishes if the average of standardized differences between observed and expected heterozygosities is significantly different from zero. Type I and II errors have been evaluated by computer simulations, varying sample size, number of loci, bottleneck size, time elapsed since the beginning of the bottleneck and level of variability of loci. These analyses show that the most useful markers for bottleneck detection are those evolving under the infinite allele model (IAM) and they provide guidelines for selecting sample sizes of individuals and loci. The usefulness of these tests for conservation biology is discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Genetic Structure and Diversity in Oryza sativa L.
Garris, A. J., Tai, T. H., Coburn, J., Kresovich, S., & McCouch, S. (2005) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.104.035642 · Cited by 1,137
Counting Alleles with Rarefaction: Private Alleles and Hierarchical Sampling Designs
Kalinowski, S. T. (2004) · Conservation Genetics · doi:10.1023/b:coge.0000041021.91777.1a · Cited by 722
Reliability of genetic bottleneck tests for detecting recent population declines
PEERY, M. Z., KIRBY, R., REID, B. N., STOELTING, R., DOUCET‐BËER, E., ROBINSON, S., VÁSQUEZ‐CARRILLO, C., PAULI, J. N., & PALSBØLL, P. J. (2012) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2012.05635.x · Cited by 578
The Effects of a Bottleneck on Inbreeding Depression and the Genetic Load
Kirkpatrick, M., & Jarne, P. (2000) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/303312 · Cited by 271
Conservation and the Genomics of Populations
Allendorf, F. W., Funk, W. C., Aitken, S. N., Byrne, M., Luikart, G., & Antunes, A. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198856566.001.0001 · Cited by 207
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Cornuet, J. M., & Luikart, G.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996-12-01
- Volume
- 144
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2001-2014
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W2167464793
- Cited by
- 4,355
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Description and Power Analysis of Two Tests for Detecting Recent Population Bottlenecks From Allele Frequency Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/genetics/144.4.2001
- The paper
- Cornuet, J. M., & Luikart, G. (1996). Description and Power Analysis of Two Tests for Detecting Recent Population Bottlenecks From Allele Frequency Data. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/144.4.2001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.