The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Effective Size of a Subdivided Population
Abstract
This paper derives the long-term effective size, Ne, for a general model of population subdivision, allowing for differential deme fitness, variable emigration and immigration rates, extinction, colonization, and correlations across generations in these processes. We show that various long-term measures of Ne, are equivalent. The effective size of a metapopulation can be expressed in a variety of ways. At a demographic equilibrium, Ne, can be derived from the demography by combining information about the ultimate contribution of each deme to the future genetic make-up of the population and Wright's FST's. The effective size is given by Ne = 1/(1 + var (ϑ))〈(1 – fSTi)/Nin〉, where n is the number of demes, ϑi is the eventual contribution of individuals in deme i to the whole population (scaled such that Σiϑi = n), and 〈 〉 denotes an average weighted by ϑi2. This formula is applied to a catastrophic extinction model (where sites are either empty or at carrying capacity) and to a metapopulation model with explicit dynamics, where extinction is caused by demographic stochasticity and by chaos. Contrary to the expectation from the standard island model, the usual effect of population subdivision is to decrease the effective size relative to a panmictic population living on the same resource.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“in models with competition among demes, an increased level of variance in expected offspring number among demes can drastically decrease the Ne (Whitlock and Barton 1997).”
From A recent bottleneck of Y chromosome diversity coincides with a global change in culture (2015) · cites this paper as Whitlock and Barton 1997
Citations
Cited by
A recent bottleneck of Y chromosome diversity coincides with a global change in culture
Karmin, M., Saag, L., Vicente, M., Sayres, M. A. W., Järve, M., Talas, U. G., Rootsi, S., Ilumäe, A.-M., Mägi, R., Mitt, M., et al. (2015) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.186684.114 · Cited by 485
Neutral additive genetic variance in a metapopulation
WHITLOCK, M. C. (1999) · Genetical Research · doi:10.1017/s0016672399004127 · Cited by 180
Self-citationLocal Extinction and Recolonization, Species Effective Population Size, and Modern Human Origins
Eller, E., Hawks, J., & Relethford, J. H. (2009) · Human Biology · doi:10.3378/027.081.0623 · Cited by 54
Conservation corridors affect the fixation of novel alleles
Orrock, J. L. (2006) · Conservation Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10592-005-9016-6 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Whitlock, M. C., & Barton, N. H.
- Affiliations
- Institute of Cell, Animal and Population Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, United Kingdom
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1997-05-01
- Volume
- 146
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 427-441
- ISSN
- 1943-2631
- Cited by
- 434
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review