The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Van Gogh: A New Drosophila Tissue Polarity Gene
Open accessAbstract
Mutations in the Van Gogh gene result in the altered polarity of adult Drosophila cuticular structures. On the wing, Van Gogh mutations cause an altered polarity pattern that is typical of mutations that inactivate the frizzled signaling/signal transduction pathway. The phenotype however, differs from those seen previously, as the number of wing cells forming more than one hair is intermediate between that seen previously for typical frizzled-like or inturned-like mutations. Consistent with Van Gogh being involved in the function of the frizzled signaling/signal transduction pathway, Van Gogh mutations show strong interactions with mutations in frizzled and prickle. Mitotic clones of Van Gogh display domineering cell nonautonomy. In contrast to frizzled clones, Van Gogh clones alter the polarity of cells proximal (and in part anterior and posterior) but not distal to the clone. In further contrast to frizzled clones, Van Gogh clones cause neighboring wild-type hairs to point away from rather than toward the clone. This anti-frizzled type of domineering nonautonomy and the strong genetic interactions seen between frizzled and Van Gogh suggested the possibility that Van Gogh was required for the noncell autonomous function of frizzled. As a test of this possibility we induced frizzled clones in a Van Gogh mutant background and Van Gogh clones in a frizzled mutant background. In both cases the domineering nonautonomy was suppressed consistent with Van Gogh being essential for frizzled signaling.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Identification of Vangl2 and Scrb1 as planar polarity genes in mammals
Montcouquiol, M., Rachel, R. A., Lanford, P. J., Copeland, N. G., Jenkins, N. A., & Kelley, M. W. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01618 · Cited by 705
Planar cell polarity in development and disease
Butler, M. T., & Wallingford, J. B. (2017) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm.2017.11 · Cited by 580
Frizzled/PCP signalling: a conserved mechanism regulating cell polarity and directed motility
Seifert, J. R. K., & Mlodzik, M. (2007) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2042 · Cited by 513
Zebrafish trilobite identifies new roles for Strabismus in gastrulation and neuronal movements
Jessen, J. R., Topczewski, J., Bingham, S., Sepich, D. S., Marlow, F., Chandrasekhar, A., & Solnica-Krezel, L. (2002) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb828 · Cited by 504
Kibar, Z., Vogan, K. J., Groulx, N., Justice, M. J., Underhill, D. A., & Gros, P. (2001) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/90081 · Cited by 504
Metadata
- Authors
- Taylor, J., Abramova, N., Charlton, J., & Adler, P. N.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-09-01
- Volume
- 150
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 199-210
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W2105277147
- Cited by
- 326
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Van Gogh: A New Drosophila Tissue Polarity Gene. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/genetics/150.1.199
- The paper
- Taylor, J., Abramova, N., Charlton, J., & Adler, P. N. (1998). Van Gogh: A New Drosophila Tissue Polarity Gene. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/150.1.199
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.