The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genealogical Inference From Microsatellite Data
Abstract
Ease and accuracy of typing, together with high levels of polymorphism and widespread distribution in the genome, make microsatellite (or short tandem repeat) loci an attractive potential source of information about both population histories and evolutionary processes. However, microsatellite data are difficult to interpret, in particular because of the frequency of back-mutations. Stochastic models for the underlying genetic processes can be specified, but in the past they have been too complicated for direct analysis. Recent developments in stochastic simulation methodology now allow direct inference about both historical events, such as genealogical coalescence times, and evolutionary parameters, such as mutation rates. A feature of the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm that we propose here is that the likelihood computations are simplified by treating the (unknown) ancestral allelic states as auxiliary parameters. We illustrate the algorithm by analyzing microsatellite samples simulated under the model. Our results suggest that a single microsatellite usually does not provide enough information for useful inferences, but that several completely linked microsatellites can be informative about some aspects of genealogical history and evolutionary processes. We also reanalyze data from a previously published human Y chromosome microsatellite study, finding evidence for an effective population size for human Y chromosomes in the low thousands and a recent time since their most recent common ancestor: the 95% interval runs from ~15,000 to 130,000 years, with most likely values around 30,000 years.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Note that the dating method used, BATWING, provides estimates with large confidence intervals.”
From Y-chromosome descent clusters and male differential reproductive success: young lineage expansions dominate Asian pastoral nomadic populations (2015) · cites this paper as [30]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines
Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A. W., Rosenbluth, M. N., Teller, A. H., & Teller, E. (1953) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1699114 · Cited by 37,192
Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum likelihood approach.
Felsenstein, J. (1981) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf01734359 · Cited by 14,571
Research works printed but not linked: 39
- Besag, 1995, Bayesian computation and stochastic systems, Stat. Sci., 10, 3
- Best, 1995, CODA Manual version 0.30
- Brookfield, 1997, Importance of ancestral DNA ages, Nature, 388, 134, 10.1038/40543 · DOI
- Brooks, 1998, Markov chain Monte Carlo method and its application, Statistician, 47, 69, 10.1111/1467-9884.00117 · DOI · Paper page
- Cooper, 1996, Network analysis of human Y microsatellite haplotypes, Hum. Mol. Genet., 5, 1759, 10.1093/hmg/5.11.1759 · DOI
- Deka, 1996, Dispersion of human Y-chromosome haplotypes based on five microsatellites in global populations, Genome Res., 6, 1177, 10.1101/gr.6.12.1177 · DOI
- Di Rienzo, 1994, Mutational processes of simple-sequence repeat loci in human populations, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 91, 3166, 10.1073/pnas.91.8.3166 · DOI
- Di Rienzo, 1998, Heterogeneity of microsatellite mutations within and between loci, and implications for human demographic histories, Genetics, 148, 1269, 10.1093/genetics/148.3.1269 · DOI
- Donnelly, 1996, Interpreting genetic variability: the effects of shared evolutionary history, 25
- Donnelly, 1995, Coalescents and genealogical structure under neutrality, Annu. Rev. Genet., 29, 410, 10.1146/annurev.ge.29.120195.002153 · DOI
- Dover, 1996, Slippery DNA runs on and on and on, Nat. Genet., 10, 254, 10.1038/ng0795-254 · DOI
- Felsenstein, 1992, Estimating effective population size from samples of sequences: a bootstrap Monte Carlo integration method, Genet. Res., 60, 209, 10.1017/S0016672300030962 · DOI
- Fullerton, 1994, Molecular and population genetic analysis of allelic sequence diversity at the human β-globin locus, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 91, 1805, 10.1073/pnas.91.5.1805 · DOI
- Goldstein, 1996, Statistical properties of the variation at linked microsatellite loci: implications for the history of human Y chromosomes, Mol. Biol. Evol., 13, 1213, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025686 · DOI
- Gradshteyn, 1980, Table of Integrals, Series, and Products
- Griffiths, 1994, Ancestral inference in population genetics, Stat. Sci., 9, 307, 10.1214/ss/1177010378 · DOI
- Hammer, 1995, A recent common ancestry for human Y chromosomes, Nature, 378, 376, 10.1038/378376a0 · DOI
- Hammer, 1997, The geographic distribution of human Y chromosome variation, Genetics, 145, 787, 10.1093/genetics/145.3.787 · DOI
- Harding, 1997, A gene tree for beta-globin sequences from Melanesia, J. Mol. Evol., 44, s133, 10.1007/PL00000063 · DOI
- Hastings, 1970, Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications, Biometrika, 57, 97, 10.1093/biomet/57.1.97 · DOI · Paper page
- Heyer, 1997, Estimating Y chromosome specific microsatellite mutation frequencies using deep rooting pedigrees, Hum. Mol. Genet., 6, 799, 10.1093/hmg/6.5.799 · DOI
- Hudson, 1991, Gene genealogies and the coalescent process, 1
- Jarne, 1996, Microsatellites, from molecules to populations and back, Trends Ecol. Evol., 11, 424, 10.1016/0169-5347(96)10049-5 · DOI
- Kingman, 1982, The coalescent, Stoch. Proc. Appl., 13, 235, 10.1016/0304-4149(82)90011-4 · DOI
- Kuhner, 1995, Estimating effective population size from sequence data using Metropolis-Hastings sampling, Genetics, 140, 1421, 10.1093/genetics/140.4.1421 · DOI
- Levinson, 1987, Slipped-strand mispairing: a major mechanism for DNA sequence evolution, Mol. Biol. Evol., 4, 203
- Nei, 1987, Molecular Evolutionary Genetics, 10.7312/nei-92038 · DOI
- Nielsen, 1997, A likelihood approach to population samples of microsatellite alleles, Genetics, 146, 711, 10.1093/genetics/146.2.711 · DOI
- Ohta, 1973, A model of mutation appropriate to estimate the number of electrophoretically detectable alleles in a finite population, Genet. Res., 22, 201, 10.1017/S0016672300012994 · DOI
- Press, 1992, Numerical Recipes in C
- Rubinsztein, 1996, Microsatellite evolution—evidence for directionality and variation in rate between species, Nat. Genet., 10, 337, 10.1038/ng0795-337 · DOI
- Ruiz Linares, 1996, Geographic clustering of human Y-chromosome haplotypes, Ann. Hum. Genet., 60, 401, 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1996.tb00438.x · DOI
- Shriver, 1993, VNTR allele frequency distributions under the stepwise mutation model: a computer simulation approach, Genetics, 134, 983, 10.1093/genetics/134.3.983 · DOI
- Slatkin, 1995, A measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies, Genetics, 139, 457, 10.1093/genetics/139.1.457 · DOI
- Tavaré, 1997, Inferring coalescence times from DNA sequence data, Genetics, 145, 505, 10.1093/genetics/145.2.505 · DOI
- Templeton, 1993, The “Eve” hypotheses: a genetic critique and reanalysis, Am. Anthropol., 95, 51, 10.1525/aa.1993.95.1.02a00030 · DOI
- Valdes, 1993, Allele frequencies at microsatellite loci: the stepwise mutation model revisited, Genetics, 133, 737, 10.1093/genetics/133.3.737 · DOI
- Weber, 1993, Mutation of human short tandem repeats, Hum. Mol. Genet., 8, 1123, 10.1093/hmg/2.8.1123 · DOI
- Zerjal, 1997, Genetic relationships of Asians and Northern Europeans, revealed by Y-chromosomal DNA analysis, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 60, 1174
Cited by
Relaxed Phylogenetics and Dating with Confidence
Drummond, A. J., Ho, S. Y. W., Phillips, M. J., & Rambaut, A. (2006) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040088 · Cited by 6,463
Approximate Bayesian computation in population genetics
Beaumont, M. A., Zhang, W., & Balding, D. J. (2002) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/162.4.2025 · Cited by 2,932
Self-citationDrummond, A. J., Nicholls, G. K., Rodrigo, A. G., & Solomon, W. (2002) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/161.3.1307 · Cited by 1,059
Genealogical trees, coalescent theory and the analysis of genetic polymorphisms
Rosenberg, N. A., & Nordborg, M. (2002) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg795 · Cited by 750
The Genetic Legacy of the Mongols
Zerjal, T., Xue, Y., Bertorelle, G., Wells, R. S., Bao, W., Zhu, S., Qamar, R., Ayub, Q., Mohyuddin, A., Fu, S., et al. (2003) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/367774 · Cited by 563
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilson, I. J., & Balding, D. J.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-09-01
- Volume
- 150
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 499-510
- ISSN
- 1943-2631
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genealogical Inference From Microsatellite Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/genetics/150.1.499
- The paper
- Wilson, I. J., & Balding, D. J. (1998). Genealogical Inference From Microsatellite Data. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/150.1.499