The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Estimating Recombinational Parameters in Streptococcus pneumoniae From Multilocus Sequence Typing Data
Abstract
Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) is a highly discriminatory molecular typing method that defines isolates of bacterial pathogens using the sequences of ~450-bp internal fragments of seven housekeeping genes. This technique has been applied to 575 isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae and identifies a number of discrete clonal complexes. These clonal complexes are typically represented by a single group of isolates sharing identical alleles at all seven loci, plus single-locus variants that differ from this group at only one out of the seven loci. As MLST is highly discriminatory, the members of each clonal complex can be assumed to have a recent common ancestor, and the molecular events that give rise to the single-locus variants can be used to estimate the relative contributions of recombination and mutation to clonal divergence. By comparing the sequences of the variant alleles within each clonal complex with the allele typically found within that clonal complex, we estimate that recombination has generated new alleles at a frequency ~10-fold higher than mutation, and that a single nucleotide site is ~50 times more likely to change through recombination than mutation. We also demonstrate how to estimate the average length of recombinational replacements from MLST data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Smith, J. M., Smith, N. H., O'Rourke, M., & Spratt, B. G. (1993) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.90.10.4384 · Cited by 1,802
Self-citation
Cited by
Acinetobacter baumannii : Emergence of a Successful Pathogen
Peleg, A. Y., Seifert, H., & Paterson, D. L. (2008) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00058-07 · Cited by 3,316
The role of nasal carriage in Staphylococcus aureus infections
Wertheim, H. F., Melles, D. C., Vos, M. C., van Leeuwen, W., van Belkum, A., Verbrugh, H. A., & Nouwen, J. L. (2005) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(05)70295-4 · Cited by 2,685
Feil, E. J., Holmes, E. C., Bessen, D. E., Chan, M.-S., Day, N. P. J., Enright, M. C., Goldstein, R., Hood, D. W., Kalia, A., Moore, C. E., et al. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.98.1.182 · Cited by 522
Self-citationOliveira, D. C., Tomasz, A., & de Lencastre, H. (2002) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(02)00227-x · Cited by 494
Kim, L., McGee, L., Tomczyk, S., & Beall, B. (2016) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00058-15 · Cited by 285
Metadata
- Authors
- Feil, E. J., Smith, J. M., Enright, M. C., & Spratt, B. G.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-04-01
- Volume
- 154
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1439-1450
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W2137134809
- Cited by
- 250
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimating Recombinational Parameters in Streptococcus pneumoniae From Multilocus Sequence Typing Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/genetics/154.4.1439
- The paper
- Feil, E. J., Smith, J. M., Enright, M. C., & Spratt, B. G. (2000). Estimating Recombinational Parameters in Streptococcus pneumoniae From Multilocus Sequence Typing Data. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/154.4.1439
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.