The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recombination within natural populations of pathogenic bacteria: Short-term empirical estimates and long-term phylogenetic consequences
Open accessAbstract
The identification of clones within bacterial populations is often taken as evidence for a low rate of recombination, but the validity of this inference is rarely examined. We have used statistical tests of congruence between gene trees to examine the extent and significance of recombination in six bacterial pathogens. For Neisseria meningitidis , Streptococcus pneumoniae , Streptococcus pyogenes, and Staphylococcus aureus , the congruence between the maximum likelihood trees reconstructed using seven house-keeping genes was in most cases no better than that between each tree and trees of random topology. The lack of congruence between gene trees in these four species, which include both naturally transformable and nontransformable species, is in three cases supported by high ratios of recombination to point mutation during clonal diversification (estimates of this parameter were not possible for Strep. pyogenes ). In contrast, gene trees constructed for Hemophilus influenzae and pathogenic isolates of Escherichia coli showed a higher degree of congruence, suggesting lower rates of recombination. The impact of recombination therefore varies between bacterial species but in many species is sufficient to obliterate the phylogenetic signal in gene trees.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Smith, J. M., Smith, N. H., O'Rourke, M., & Spratt, B. G. (1993) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.90.10.4384 · Cited by 1,802
Self-citation
Cited by
Re-evaluating prokaryotic species
Gevers, D., Cohan, F. M., Lawrence, J. G., Spratt, B. G., Coenye, T., Feil, E. J., Stackebrandt, E., de Peer, Y. V., Vandamme, P., Thompson, F. L., et al. (2005) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1236 · Cited by 1,122
Self-citationProkaryotic Evolution in Light of Gene Transfer
Gogarten, J. P., Doolittle, W. F., & Lawrence, J. G. (2002) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004046 · Cited by 986
Horizontal gene transfer and adaptive evolution in bacteria.
Arnold, B. J., Huang, I.-T., & Hanage, W. P. (2022) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-021-00650-4 · Cited by 869
Horizontal Transfer, Not Duplication, Drives the Expansion of Protein Families in Prokaryotes
Treangen, T. J., & Rocha, E. P. C. (2011) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1001284 · Cited by 509
“Interestingly, both clades naturally transform conspecific DNA and are known to have extremely high rates of intra-species horizontal transfer [42,43].”
BackgroundVariation in the strength of selected codon usage bias among bacteria
Sharp, P. M. (2005) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gki242 · Cited by 429
Metadata
- Authors
- Feil, E. J., Holmes, E. C., Bessen, D. E., Chan, M.-S., Day, N. P. J., Enright, M. C., Goldstein, R., Hood, D. W., Kalia, A., Moore, C. E., Zhou, J., & Spratt, B. G.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2001-01-02
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 182-187
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2151371624
- Cited by
- 522
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recombination within natural populations of pathogenic bacteria: Short-term empirical estimates and long-term phylogenetic consequences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.98.1.182
- The paper
- Feil, E. J., Holmes, E. C., Bessen, D. E., Chan, M.-S., Day, N. P. J., Enright, M. C., Goldstein, R., Hood, D. W., Kalia, A., Moore, C. E., Zhou, J., & Spratt, B. G. (2001). Recombination within natural populations of pathogenic bacteria: Short-term empirical estimates and long-term phylogenetic consequences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.98.1.182
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.