The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Consequences of Recombination on Traditional Phylogenetic Analysis
Abstract
We investigate the shape of a phylogenetic tree reconstructed from sequences evolving under the coalescent with recombination. The motivation is that evolutionary inferences are often made from phylogenetic trees reconstructed from population data even though recombination may well occur (mtDNA or viral sequences) or does occur (nuclear sequences). We investigate the size and direction of biases when a single tree is reconstructed ignoring recombination. Standard software (PHYLIP) was used to construct the best phylogenetic tree from sequences simulated under the coalescent with recombination. With recombination present, the length of terminal branches and the total branch length are larger, and the time to the most recent common ancestor smaller, than for a tree reconstructed from sequences evolving with no recombination. The effects are pronounced even for small levels of recombination that may not be immediately detectable in a data set. The phylogenies when recombination is present superficially resemble phylogenies for sequences from an exponentially growing population. However, exponential growth has a different effect on statistics such as Tajima's D. Furthermore, ignoring recombination leads to a large overestimation of the substitution rate heterogeneity and the loss of the molecular clock. These results are discussed in relation to viral and mtDNA data sets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum likelihood approach.
Felsenstein, J. (1981) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf01734359 · Cited by 14,571
Hudson, R. R., & Kaplan, N. L. (1985) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/111.1.147 · Cited by 1,555
Evidence of recombination among enteroviruses
Santti, J., Hyypiä, T., Kinnunen, L., & Salminen, M. (1999) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.73.10.8741-8749.1999 · Cited by 259
Cited by
Bayesian inference of species trees from multilocus data
Heled, J., & Drummond, A. J. (2010) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msp274 · Cited by 2,453
A Simple and Robust Statistical Test for Detecting the Presence of Recombination
Bruen, T. C., Philippe, H., & Bryant, D. (2006) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.105.048975 · Cited by 1,382
A Coalescent-Based Method for Detecting and Estimating Recombination From Gene Sequences
McVean, G., Awadalla, P., & Fearnhead, P. (2002) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/160.3.1231 · Cited by 708
Establishment and cryptic transmission of Zika virus in Brazil and the Americas
Faria, N. R., Quick, J., Claro, I. M., Thézé, J., de Jesus, J. G., Giovanetti, M., Kraemer, M. U. G., Hill, S. C., Black, A., da Costa, A. C., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature22401 · Cited by 616
Anisimova, M., Nielsen, R., & Yang, Z. (2003) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/164.3.1229 · Cited by 561
Metadata
- Authors
- Schierup, M. H., & Hein, J.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-10-01
- Volume
- 156
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 879-891
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W1880845650
- Cited by
- 596
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consequences of Recombination on Traditional Phylogenetic Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/genetics/156.2.879
- The paper
- Schierup, M. H., & Hein, J. (2000). Consequences of Recombination on Traditional Phylogenetic Analysis. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/156.2.879
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.