The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bayesian Analysis of Genetic Differentiation Between Populations
Abstract
We introduce a Bayesian method for estimating hidden population substructure using multilocus molecular markers and geographical information provided by the sampling design. The joint posterior distribution of the substructure and allele frequencies of the respective populations is available in an analytical form when the number of populations is small, whereas an approximation based on a Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation approach can be obtained for a moderate or large number of populations. Using the joint posterior distribution, posteriors can also be derived for any evolutionary population parameters, such as the traditional fixation indices. A major advantage compared to most earlier methods is that the number of populations is treated here as an unknown parameter. What is traditionally considered as two genetically distinct populations, either recently founded or connected by considerable gene flow, is here considered as one panmictic population with a certain probability based on marker data and prior information. Analyses of previously published data on the Moroccan argan tree (Argania spinosa) and of simulated data sets suggest that our method is capable of estimating a population substructure, while not artificially enforcing a substructure when it does not exist. The software (BAPS) used for the computations is freely available from http://www.rni.helsinki.fi/~mjs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bernardo, J. M., & Smith, A. F. M. (1994) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470316870 · Cited by 2,178
Cited by
Inferring weak population structure with the assistance of sample group information
HUBISZ, M. J., FALUSH, D., STEPHENS, M., & PRITCHARD, J. K. (2009) · Molecular Ecology Resources · doi:10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02591.x · Cited by 3,475
Inference of Population Structure using Dense Haplotype Data
Lawson, D. J., Hellenthal, G., Myers, S., & Falush, D. (2012) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002453 · Cited by 1,188
Genetic structure is influenced by landscape features: empirical evidence from a roe deer population
COULON, A., GUILLOT, G., COSSON, J. ‐., ANGIBAULT, J. M. A., AULAGNIER, S., CARGNELUTTI, B., GALAN, M., & HEWISON, A. J. M. (2006) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2006.02861.x · Cited by 310
The Gradient Paradigm: A Conceptual and Analytical Framework for Landscape Ecology
Cushman, S. A., Gutzweiler, K., Evans, J. S., & McGarigal, K. (2010) · Spatial Complexity, Informatics, and Wildlife Conservation · doi:10.1007/978-4-431-87771-4_5 · Cited by 104
Genetic structuring and migration patterns of Atlantic bigeye tuna, Thunnus obesus (Lowe, 1839)
Gonzalez, E. G., Beerli, P., & Zardoya, R. (2008) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-8-252 · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Corander, J., Waldmann, P., & Sillanpää, M. J.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-01-01
- Volume
- 163
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 367-374
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W1886810706
- Cited by
- 860
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.