Cited by 3,475Genetic diversity and population structureForensic and Genetic ResearchGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

Inferring weak population structure with the assistance of sample group information

Open access
HUBISZ, MELISSA J., FALUSH, DANIEL, STEPHENS, MATTHEW, PRITCHARD, JONATHAN K.·2009·Molecular Ecology Resources

Abstract

Genetic clustering algorithms require a certain amount of data to produce informative results. In the common situation that individuals are sampled at several locations, we show how sample group information can be used to achieve better results when the amount of data is limited. New models are developed for the structure program, both for the cases of admixture and no admixture. These models work by modifying the prior distribution for each individual's population assignment. The new prior distributions allow the proportion of individuals assigned to a particular cluster to vary by location. The models are tested on simulated data, and illustrated using microsatellite data from the CEPH Human Genome Diversity Panel. We demonstrate that the new models allow structure to be detected at lower levels of divergence, or with less data, than the original structure models or principal components methods, and that they are not biased towards detecting structure when it is not present. These models are implemented in a new version of structure which is freely available online at http://pritch.bsd.uchicago.edu/structure.html.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02591.x

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
HUBISZ, M. J., FALUSH, D., STEPHENS, M., & PRITCHARD, J. K.
Affiliations
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • University College Cork (IE)
Corresponding author
HUBISZ, MELISSA J.
Venue
Molecular Ecology Resources
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-08-12
Volume
9
Issue
5
Pages
1322-1332
ISSN
  • 1755-098X (ISSN-L)
  • 1755-0998
OpenAlex
W2060891246
Cited by
3,475
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 83 · 2025: 109 · 2024: 162 · 2023: 148 · 2022: 192 · 2021: 239 · 2020: 245 · 2019: 239 · 2018: 265 · 2017: 236 · 2016: 298 · 2015: 282 · 2014: 250 · 2013: 259 · 2012: 210
FWCI
89.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Ecology Resources (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
population structure inference, genetic clustering, admixture, prior distributions, population assignment, small sample size, microsatellite data, principal component analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review