Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 313

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

BACTERIOPHAGE-RESISTANT MUTANTS IN ESCHERICHIA COLI

Open access
Demerec, M, Fano, U·1945·Genetics

Abstract

ACTERIA are very promising as materials for studies of mutability, be-B cause of their great speed of reproduction and because of the opportunity they present for working with populations that comprise enormous numbers of individuals.Changes in bacterial cultures which make the bacteria resistant toward certain specific bacteriophage strains have been known for a long time and have been assumed by several workers to be due to mutations (GRATIA 1921;BURNET 1929; and others).This assumption has recently been confirmed in an important study by LURIA and DELBRUCK (1943).The experimental method used by these investigators consists of determining how many resistant bacteria are present in small cultures of sensitive bacteria, especially when the size of cultures is kept so small that only a few resistants are found, on the average, in each culture.Under these conditions some cultures are still found to contain a comparatively large number of resistants.This indicates that such bacteria probably belong to a single clone stemming from an ancestor which mutated to bacteriophage resistance earlier in the growth of the culture.Changes to bacteriophage resisJance h,ave been known to be fairly specific (BAIL 1923;BURNET 1929), inasmuch as each observed change usually involves resistance to only some of the bacteriophage strains capable of attacking the original strain of bacteria.The problem of resistance in bacteria therefore offers an unusual opportunity for a quantitative study of the occurrence of specific types of mutants, which outweighs the disadvantage of not being able to check the behavior of the mutants during a sexual process.The purpose of the present study is to extend the investigation of LURIA and DELBRUCK to cover resistance to several bacteriophage strains active on the same line of Escherichia coli.In particular, we wished to determine how bacteria attain simultaneous (or "multiple") resistance to various bacteriophage strains-that is, whether or not this resistance is due to separate, independent mutational steps. MATERIALS AND METHODSThe materials used in our experiments consisted of the same bacterial strain -E. coli B-previously used by LURIA and DELBRUCK (1943), of seven phage strains active on B, and of various strains of bacteria, derived by mutation from B, which were resistant to one or more of the phages.The phage strains were indicated as type I to type 7 (TI to T7).TI and T2, with which DR.LURIA supplied us, are the alpha and gamma strains of DELBRUCK and LURIA (1942) and are identical with the P28 and PC strains of DR.J. BRONFENBREN-NER (KALMANSON and BRONFENBRENNER 1939); T3, T4, Tg, and T6 were isolated from a mixture of phages supplied by DR.TONY L. RAKIETEN; T7 was

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/genetics/30.2.119

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 313

Metadata

Authors
Demerec, M., & Fano, U.
Venue
Genetics
Published
1945-03-15
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
119-136
ISSN
  • 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-2631
OpenAlex
W1891473777
Cited by
313
References
0
FWCI
33.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: BACTERIOPHAGE-RESISTANT MUTANTS IN ESCHERICHIA COLI. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/genetics/30.2.119
The paper
Demerec, M., & Fano, U. (1945). BACTERIOPHAGE-RESISTANT MUTANTS IN ESCHERICHIA COLI. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/30.2.119

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.