Cited by 37Chromosomal and Genetic VariationsGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsEpigenetics and DNA Methylation

PARENTAL CONTROL OF POSITION-EFFECT VARIEGATION. II. EFFECT OF SEX OF PARENT CONTRIBUTING WHITE-MOTTLED REARRANGEMENT IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER

Open access
Spofford, Janice B·1961·Genetics

Abstract

Janice B Spofford; PARENTAL CONTROL OF POSITION-EFFECT VARIEGATION. II. EFFECT OF SEX OF PARENT CONTRIBUTING WHITE-MOTTLED REARRANGEMENT IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGAS

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/genetics/46.9.1151

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spofford, J. B.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Spofford, Janice B
Venue
Genetics
Published
1961-09-30
Volume
46
Issue
9
Pages
1151-1167
ISSN
  • 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-2631
OpenAlex
W1535483190
Cited by
37
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Keywords
position effect variegation, parental control, chromosomal rearrangements, Drosophila melanogaster
MeSH terms
Animals, Drosophila, Drosophila melanogaster, Parents, Chromosomal Position Effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review