The DOI matches its Crossref record.
SUPERVITAL MUTANTS OF ARABIDOPSIS
Abstract
At three loci four phenotypically different mutations were induced by x rays which affect the photoperiodic response of the carrier. The standard wild type develops visible flower primordia in 10 to 12 days after germination. The mutants have various flowering response and may need a period up to 4 to 6 times as long for the completion of the same developmental stage. In spite of the large differences in the time required for the onset of fiowering, the life cycle of the latest mutant is only 2 to 3 times that of the wild type. The slower development is accompanied by very vigorous growth; dry matter production may increase over 20 times and seed production may rise tenfold. These hereditary changes do not involve impaired genetic transmission, altered crossing-over value or visible chromosomal alterations. In three different competitive populations (mutant x wild) under long-day conditions, in the greenhouse, during a 60-week period (about ten generations of the wild type), the mutant allele increased from the initial 0.500 frequency to 0.869, 0.995, and 0.997, respectively. The roughly estimated selective advantage of the mutants under the experimental conditions varies from 0.3 to over 1.0. These are extremely high values. Since the progressmore » of selection is rapid in self-fertilizing plant community, if vigorous late mutants occur at a fair rate, their rapid increase may be expected. In nature late ecotypes are prevalent. The possible evolution of the photoperiodic response in the species is discussed. The suggestion is made that the different degree of dominance of the late ecotypes, based on modifier genes, indicates the evolution of dominance of the character concerned and the late flowering forms in nature represent the emergence of the new wild type of the species. (auth)« less
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The genetic basis of flowering responses to seasonal cues
Andrés, F., & Coupland, G. (2012) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3291 · Cited by 1,538
Seasonal and developmental timing of flowering
Amasino, R. (2010) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2010.04148.x · Cited by 894
Robson, F., Costa, M. M. R., Hepworth, S. R., Vizir, I., Pin˜eiro, M., Reeves, P. H., Putterill, J., & Coupland, G. (2001) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.01163.x · Cited by 513
Metadata
- Authors
- Rédei, G. P.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1962-04-01
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 443-460
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W2159729054
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SUPERVITAL MUTANTS OF ARABIDOPSIS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/genetics/47.4.443
- The paper
- Rédei, G. P. (1962). SUPERVITAL MUTANTS OF ARABIDOPSIS. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/47.4.443
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.