Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 513

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Functional importance of conserved domains in the flowering‐time gene CONSTANS demonstrated by analysis of mutant alleles and transgenic plants

Robson, Frances, Costa, M. Manuela R, Hepworth, Shelley R, Vizir, Igor, Pin˜eiro, Manuel, Reeves, Paul H, Putterill, Joanna, Coupland, George·2001·The Plant Journal

Abstract

Summary: CONSTANS promotes flowering of Arabidopsis in response to long‐day conditions. We show that CONSTANS is a member of an Arabidopsis gene family that comprises 16 other members. The CO‐Like proteins encoded by these genes contain two segments of homology: a zinc finger containing region near their amino terminus and a CCT (CO, CO‐Like, TOC1) domain near their carboxy terminus. Analysis of seven classical co mutant alleles demonstrated that the mutations all occur within either the zinc finger region or the CCT domain, confirming that the two regions of homology are important for CO function. The zinc fingers are most similar to those of B‐boxes, which act as protein–protein interaction domains in several transcription factors described in animals. Segments of CO protein containing the CCT domain localize GFP to the nucleus, but one mutation that affects the CCT domain delays flowering without affecting the nuclear localization function, suggesting that this domain has additional functions. All eight co alleles, including one recovered by pollen irradiation in which DNA encoding both B‐boxes is deleted, are shown to be semidominant. This dominance appears to be largely due to a reduction in CO dosage in the heterozygous plants. However, some alleles may also actively delay flowering, because overexpression from the CaMV 35S promoter of the co‐3 allele, that has a mutation in the second B‐box, delayed flowering of wild‐type plants. The significance of these observations for the role of CO in the control of flowering time is discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.01163.x

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 54 references

Cited by

See all 513

Metadata

Authors
Robson, F., Costa, M. M. R., Hepworth, S. R., Vizir, I., Pin˜eiro, M., Reeves, P. H., Putterill, J., & Coupland, G.
Venue
The Plant Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-12
Volume
28
Issue
6
Pages
619-631
ISSN
  • 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-313X
OpenAlex
W2126526177
Cited by
513
References
54
FWCI
15.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Functional importance of conserved domains in the flowering‐time gene CONSTANS demonstrated by analysis of mutant alleles and transgenic plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.01163.x
The paper
Robson, F., Costa, M. M. R., Hepworth, S. R., Vizir, I., Pin˜eiro, M., Reeves, P. H., Putterill, J., & Coupland, G. (2001). Functional importance of conserved domains in the flowering‐time gene CONSTANS demonstrated by analysis of mutant alleles and transgenic plants. The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.01163.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.