The DOI matches its Crossref record.
DEFECTIVE KERNEL MUTANTS OF MAIZE. I. GENETIC AND LETHALITY STUDIES
Abstract
A planting of 3,919 M1 kernels from normal ears crossed by EMS-treated pollen produced 3,461 M1 plants and 3,172 selfed ears. These plants yielded 2,477 (72%) total heritable changes; the selfed ears yielded 2,457 (78%) recessive mutants, including 855 (27%) recessive kernel mutants and 8 (0.23%) viable dominant mutants. The ratio of recessive to dominant mutants was 201:l. The average mutation frequency for four known loci was three per 3,172 genomes analyzed. The estimated total number of loci mutated was 535 and the estimated number of kernel mutant loci mutated was 285. Among the 855 kernel mutants, 432 had a nonviable embryo, and 59 germinated but had a lethal seedling. A sample of 194 of the latter two types was tested for heritability, lethality, chromosome arm location and endosperm-embryo interaction between mutant and nonmutant tissues in special hyper-hypoploid combinations produced by manipulation of B-A translocations. The selected 194 mutants were characterized and catalogued according to endosperm phenotype and investigated to determine their effects on the morphology and development of the associated embryo. The possibility of rescuing some of the lethal mutants by covering the mutant embryo with a normal endosperm was investigated. Ninety of these 194 mutants were located on 17 of the 18 chromosome arms tested. Nineteen of the located mutants were examined to determine the effect of having a normal embryo in the same kernel with a mutant endosperm, and vice versa, as compared to the expression observed in kernels with both embryo and endosperm in a mutant condition. In the first situation, for three of the 19 mutants, the mutant endosperm was less extreme (the embryo helped); for seven cases, the mutant endosperm was more extreme (the embryo hindered); and for nine cases, there was no change. In the reverse situation, for four cases the normal endosperm helped the mutant embryo; for 14 cases there was no change and one case was inconclusive.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nuclear Endosperm Development in Cereals and Arabidopsis thaliana
Olsen, O.-A. (2004) · THE PLANT CELL ONLINE · doi:10.1105/tpc.017111 · Cited by 490
Endosperm origin, development, and function.
Lopes, M. A., & Larkins, B. A. (1993) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.5.10.1383 · Cited by 417
E NDOSPERM D EVELOPMENT: Cellularization and Cell Fate Specification
Olsen, O.-A. (2001) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.52.1.233 · Cited by 384
Steady‐state transposon mutagenesis in inbred maize
McCarty, D. R., Mark Settles, A., Suzuki, M., Tan, B. C., Latshaw, S., Porch, T., Robin, K., Baier, J., Avigne, W., Lai, J., et al. (2005) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2005.02509.x · Cited by 262
Single and multiple gene knockouts by CRISPR–Cas9 in maize
Doll, N. M., Gilles, L. M., Gérentes, M.-F., Richard, C., Just, J., Fierlej, Y., Borrelli, V. M. G., Gendrot, G., Ingram, G. C., Rogowsky, P. M., et al. (2019) · Plant Cell Reports · doi:10.1007/s00299-019-02378-1 · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Authors
- Neuffer, M. G., & Sheridan, W. F.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1980-08-01
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 929-944
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W1839046611
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DEFECTIVE KERNEL MUTANTS OF MAIZE. I. GENETIC AND LETHALITY STUDIES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/genetics/95.4.929
- The paper
- Neuffer, M. G., & Sheridan, W. F. (1980). DEFECTIVE KERNEL MUTANTS OF MAIZE. I. GENETIC AND LETHALITY STUDIES. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/95.4.929
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.