The DOI matches its Crossref record.
ANALYSIS OF PLEIOTROPISM AT THE DOMINANT WHITE-SPOTTING (W) LOCUS OF THE HOUSE MOUSE: A DESCRIPTION OF TEN NEW W ALLELES
Open accessAbstract
Characterization of the pleiotropic effects of ten new putative W locus mutations, nine co-isogenic and one highly congenic with the C57BL/6J strain, reveals a wide variety of influences upon pigmentation, blood formation and gametogenesis. None of the putative alleles, each of which is closely linked to Ph, a gene 0.1 cM from W, gave evidence of complementation with W39, a new allele previously shown to be allelic to Wv. All W*/W39 genotypes resulted in black-eyed-white anemics with reduced gametogenic activity.1 Homozygotes for seven of these mutations are lethal during perinatal life; anemic embryos have been identified in litters produced by intercross matings involving each of these alleles. —Phenotypes of mice of several mutant genotypes provide exceptions to the frequent observation that a double dose of dominant W alleles (e.g., W/Wv or W/W) results in defects of corresponding severity in each of the three affected tissues. One viable homozygote has little or no defect in blood formation, and another appears to have normal fertility. The phenotypes of these homozygotes support the conclusion that the three tissue defects are not dependent on each other for their appearance and probably do not result from a single physiological disturbance during the development of the embryo. —Although homozygosity for members of this series results in a wide range of phenotypes, the absence of complementation of any allele with W39, the close proximity of each mutant to Ph, and the fact that all alleles produce detectable (though sometimes marginal) defects in the same tissues affected by W and Wv, support the hypothesis that each new mutant gene is a W allele.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The dominant-white spotting (W) locus of the mouse encodes the c-kit proto-oncogene
Geissler, E. N., Ryan, M. A., & Housman, D. E. (1988) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(88)90020-7 · Cited by 1,287
Self-citationAn early haematopoietic defect in mice lacking the transcription factor GATA-2
Tsai, F.-Y., Keller, G., Kuo, F. C., Weiss, M., Chen, J., Rosenblatt, M., Alt, F. W., & Orkin, S. H. (1994) · Nature · doi:10.1038/371221a0 · Cited by 1,237
Grimbaldeston, M. A., Chen, C.-C., Piliponsky, A. M., Tsai, M., Tam, S.-Y., & Galli, S. J. (2005) · The American Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9440(10)62055-x · Cited by 525
Contiguous patterns of c-kit and steel expression: analysis of mutations at the W and Sl loci
Motro, B., Kooy, D. V. D., Rossant, J., Reith, A., & Bernstein, A. (1991) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.113.4.1207 · Cited by 296
A single-cell hematopoietic landscape resolves 8 lineage trajectories and defects in Kit mutant mice
Dahlin, J. S., Hamey, F. K., Pijuan-Sala, B., Shepherd, M., Lau, W. W. Y., Nestorowa, S., Weinreb, C., Wolock, S., Hannah, R., Diamanti, E., et al. (2018) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2017-12-821413 · Cited by 233
Metadata
- Authors
- Geissler, E. N., McFarland, E. C., & Russell, E. S.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1981-02-01
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 337-361
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W2107705298
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ANALYSIS OF PLEIOTROPISM AT THE DOMINANT WHITE-SPOTTING (W) LOCUS OF THE HOUSE MOUSE: A DESCRIPTION OF TEN NEW W ALLELES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/genetics/97.2.337
- The paper
- Geissler, E. N., McFarland, E. C., & Russell, E. S. (1981). ANALYSIS OF PLEIOTROPISM AT THE DOMINANT WHITE-SPOTTING (W) LOCUS OF THE HOUSE MOUSE: A DESCRIPTION OF TEN NEW W ALLELES. Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/97.2.337
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.