Cited by 52Aging, Health, and DisabilityFrailty in Older AdultsHealth disparities and outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Self-Rated Health as a Risk Factor for Prescribed Drug Use and Future Health and Social Service Use in Older People

Bath, P. A.·1999·The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Self-rated health is an independent predictor of mortality in older people. Recently, the need to explore other health outcomes that may be predicted by global self-ratings of health has been identified. The aim of this work was to explore the use of self-rated health as a predictor for future health and social service use and for use of prescribed medication. METHODS: 1042 community-dwelling people aged 65 and over living in Nottingham, United Kingdom, were interviewed in 1985, and survivors were reinterviewed in 1989 and 1993. Cox regression and logistic regression models were developed to see whether a self-rating of health was a predictor of 12-year mortality and of baseline, 4-year, and 8-year health and social service use and use of prescribed medication. RESULTS: Baseline self-rating of health was an independent risk factor for 12-year mortality, and for having seen the general practitioner, community nurse, home help support in the month before the interview, and for increased medication use. Baseline self-rating of health was also a risk factor for 4-year and 8-year use of these services and increased medication use, although it was not significant when baseline service/medication use was included in regression models. CONCLUSIONS: Self-rating of health not only predicts mortality, but is also useful for predicting long-term service and medication use among older people who live for a number of years.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/gerona/54.11.m565

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 9 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 52

Metadata

Authors
Bath, P. A.
Affiliations
University of Sheffield (GB)
Corresponding author
Bath, P. A.
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
Published
1999-11-01
Volume
54
Issue
11
Pages
M565-M570
ISSN
  • 1079-5006 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-535X
OpenAlex
W2118430863
Cited by
52
References
9
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
self-rated health, older adults, health care utilization, social services use, mortality prediction, community-dwelling older adults, general practitioner visits, community nursing
MeSH terms
Aged, Drug Therapy, Female, Health, Humans, Male, Mortality, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors, Social Work

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review