The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Screening for Undernutrition in Geriatric Practice: Developing the Short-Form Mini-Nutritional Assessment (MNA-SF)
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Mini-Nutritional Assessment (MNA) is a validated assessment instrument for nutritional problems, but its length limits its usefulness for screening. We sought to develop a screening version of this instrument, the MNA-SF, that retains good diagnostic accuracy. METHODS: We reanalyzed data from France that were used to develop the original MNA and combined these with data collected in Spain and New MEXICO: Of the 881 subjects with complete MNA data, 151 were from France, 400 were from Spain, and 330 were from New MEXICO: Independent ratings of clinical nutritional status were available for 142 of the French subjects. Overall, 73.8% were community dwelling, and mean age was 76.4 years. Items were chosen for the MNA-SF on the basis of item correlation with the total MNA score and with clinical nutritional status, internal consistency, reliability, completeness, and ease of administration. RESULTS: After testing multiple versions, we identified an optimal six-item MNA-SF total score ranging from 0 to 14. The cut-point score for MNA-SF was calculated using clinical nutritional status as the gold standard (n = 142) and using the total MNA score (n = 881). The MNA-SF was strongly correlated with the total MNA score (r = .945). Using an MNA-SF score of > or = 11 as normal, sensitivity was 97.9%, specificity was 100%, and diagnostic accuracy was 98.7% for predicting undernutrition. CONCLUSIONS: The MNA-SF can identify persons with undernutrition and can be used in a two-step screening process in which persons, identified as "at risk" on the MNA-SF, would receive additional assessment to confirm the diagnosis and plan interventions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Three validated questionnaires were implemented to assess the older adult’s frailty status covering multiple health domains.”
From Embodied Conversational Agent Appearance for Health Assessment of Older Adults: Explorative Study (2020) · cites this paper as [23]
Citations
Cites
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · Cited by 88,282
Progress in Development of the Index of ADL
Katz, S., Downs, T. D., Cash, H., & Grotz, R. C. (1970) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/10.1_part_1.20 · Cited by 4,129
Guigoz, Y., Vellas, B. J., Garry, P. J., Vellas, B. J., & Albaréde, J. L. (1994) · Cited by 892
Self-citationNutrition and health risks in the elderly: the nutrition screening initiative.
Posner, B. M., Jette, A. M., SMITH, K., & Miller, D. R. (1993) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.83.7.972 · Cited by 469
Galanos, A. N., Pieper, C. F., Cornoni‐Huntley, J. C., Bales, C. W., & Fillenbaum, G. G. (1994) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1994.tb07483.x · Cited by 311
Guigoz, Y., & Vellas, B. J. (1999) · KARGER eBooks · doi:10.1159/000062967 · Cited by 299
Self-citationProtein‐Calorie Undernutrition in the Nursing Home
Rudman, D., & Feller, A. (1989) · Journal of The American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1989.tb05880.x · Cited by 217
Nutrition Screening in Older Persons
Reuben, D. B., Greendale, G. A., & Harrison, G. G. (1995) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1995.tb05818.x · Cited by 154
Geriatric assessment technology : the state of the art
Rubenstein, L. Z., Wieland, D., & Bernabei, R. (1995) · Springer eBooks · Cited by 122
Self-citationProgress in the Development of a Nutritional Risk Index
Wolinsky, F. D., Coe, R. M., McIntosh, W. A., Kubena, K. S., Prendergast, J. M., Chavez, M. N., Miller, D. K., Romeis, J. C., & Landmann, W. A. (1990) · Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/120.suppl_11.1549 · Cited by 104
Incalzi, R. A., Landi, F., Cipriani, L., Bruno, E., Pagano, F. C., Gemma, A., Capparella, O., & Carbonin, P. (1996) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1996.tb02434.x · Cited by 99
NUTRITION SCREENING IN OLD PEOPLE: Its Place in a Coherent Practice of Preventive Health Care
Rush, D. (1997) · Annual Review of Nutrition · doi:10.1146/annurev.nutr.17.1.101 · Cited by 58
Practical and Validated Use of the Mini Nutritional Assessment in Geriatric Evaluation
Garry, P. J., & Vellas, B. J. (1999) · Nutrition in Clinical Care · doi:10.1046/j.1523-5408.1999.00108.x · Cited by 35
Self-citationSchoenberg, N. E., Coward, R. T., Gilbert, G. H., & Mullens, R. A. (1997) · Journal of Applied Gerontology · doi:10.1177/073346489701600203 · Cited by 15
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- 1996, REV GERONTOL, 6, 319
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cederholm, T., Jensen, G. L., Correia, M. I. T. D., Gonzalez, M. C., Fukushima, R., Higashiguchi, T., Baptista, G., Barazzoni, R., Blaauw, R., Coats, A., et al. (2019) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2018.08.002 · Cited by 3,022
Kaiser, M., Bauer, J. M., Rämsch, C., Uter, W. J. C., Guigoz, Y., Cederholm, T., Thomas, D. R., Anthony, P. S., Charlton, K. E., Maggio, M. G., et al. (2009) · The journal of nutrition health & aging · doi:10.1007/s12603-009-0214-7 · Cited by 2,083
Self-citationBaracos, V. E., Martin, L., Korc, M., Guttridge, D. C., & Fearon, K. C. H. (2018) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2017.105 · Cited by 1,738
Cederholm, T., Jensen, G. L., Correia, M. I. T. D., Gonzalez, M. C., Fukushima, R., Higashiguchi, T., Baptista, G., Barazzoni, R., Blaauw, R., Coats, A. J. S., et al. (2019) · Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle · doi:10.1002/jcsm.12383 · Cited by 1,724
Stratton, R. J., Hackston, A., Longmore, D., Dixon, R., Price, S., Stroud, M. A., King, C. L., & Elia, M. (2004) · British Journal Of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn20041258 · Cited by 1,247
Metadata
- Authors
- Rubenstein, L. Z., Harker, J. O., Salva, A., Guigoz, Y., & Vellas, B.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- VA Sepulveda Ambulatory Care Center (US)
- Nestlé (Switzerland) (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Rubenstein, L. Z.
- Venue
- The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-06-01
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- M366-M372
- ISSN
- 1079-5006 (ISSN-L)
- 1758-535X
- OpenAlex
- W2122613011
- Cited by
- 2,751
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 252 · 2025: 266 · 2024: 265 · 2023: 239 · 2022: 252 · 2021: 263 · 2020: 179 · 2019: 143 · 2018: 112 · 2017: 112 · 2016: 109 · 2015: 93 · 2014: 79 · 2013: 61 · 2012: 76
- FWCI
- 5.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journals of Gerontology Series A (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center
- VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Nutrition and Health in Aging
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
- Keywords
- Mini Nutritional Assessment, undernutrition screening, nutritional assessment, older adults, elderly nutrition, screening tool development, diagnostic accuracy, two-stage screening
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Female, Geriatrics, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Nutrition Disorders, Professional Practice, Nutrition Assessment, Discriminant Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review