Unobtrusive Sensing Technology Detects Ecologically Valid Spatiotemporal Patterns of Daily Routines Distinctive to Persons With Mild Cognitive Impairment
Open accessAbstract
Background: The ability to capture people’s movement throughout their home is a powerful approach to inform spatiotemporal patterns of routines associated with cognitive impairment. The study estimated indoor room activities over 24 hours and investigated relationships between diurnal activity patterns and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Methods: One hundred and sixty-one older adults (26 with MCI) living alone (age = 78.9 ± 9.2) were included from 2 study cohorts—the Oregon Center for Aging & Technology and the Minority Aging Research Study. Indoor room activities were measured by the number of trips made to rooms (bathroom, bedroom, kitchen, living room). Trips made to rooms (transitions) were detected using passive infrared motion sensors fixed on the walls for a month. Latent trajectory models were used to identify distinct diurnal patterns of room activities and characteristics associated with each trajectory. Results: Latent trajectory models identified 2 diurnal patterns of bathroom usage (high and low usage). Participants with MCI were more likely to be in the high bathroom usage group that exhibited more trips to the bathroom than the low-usage group (odds ratio [OR] = 4.1, 95% CI [1.3–13.5], p = .02). For kitchen activity, 2 diurnal patterns were identified (high and low activity). Participants with MCI were more likely to be in the high kitchen activity group that exhibited more transitions to the kitchen throughout the day and night than the low kitchen activity group (OR = 3.2, 95% CI [1.1–9.1], p = .03). Conclusions: The linkage between bathroom and kitchen activities with MCI may be the result of biological, health, and environmental factors in play. In-home, real-time unobtrusive-sensing offers a novel way of delineating cognitive health with chronologically-ordered movement across indoor locations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent advances in DHTs have allowed researchers to observe individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) structuring their days differently than those with normal cognition.
“Recent advances in DHTs have allowed researchers to observe individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) structuring their days differently than those with normal cognition, 36 , 37”
From Developing digital health technologies for frontotemporal degeneration (2025) · cites this paper as [36]
Cites
Ikeda, M. (2002) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.73.4.371 · Cited by 499 · see citing works
Circadian rest-activity pattern changes in aging and preclinical Alzheimer disease
Musiek, E. S., Bhimasani, M., Zangrilli, M. A., Morris, J. C., Holtzman, D. M., & Ju, Y.-E. S. (2018) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.4719 · Cited by 465 · see citing works
Beattie, Z., Miller, L. M., Almirola, C., Au-Yeung, W.-T. M., Bernard, H., Cosgrove, K. E., Dodge, H. H., Gamboa, C. J., Golonka, O., Gothard, S., et al. (2020) · Digital Biomarkers · doi:10.1159/000512208 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Designing the next-generation clinical care pathway for Alzheimer’s disease
Hampel, H., Au, R., Mattke, S., van der Flier, W. M., Aisen, P., Apostolova, L., Chen, C., Cho, M., De Santi, S., Gao, P., et al. (2022) · Nature Aging · doi:10.1038/s43587-022-00269-x · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Hantke, N. C., Kaye, J., Mattek, N., Wu, C.-Y., Dodge, H. H., Beattie, Z., & Woltjer, R. (2023) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0286812 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Self-citationDeveloping digital health technologies for frontotemporal degeneration
Nevler, N., Niehoff, D., Gleixner, A. M., Dodge, S., Vogel, A. P., Hill, D. L., Ducharme, S., Staffaroni, A. M., Yunusova, Y., Au, R., et al. (2025) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.70082 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Wu, C.-Y., Dodge, H. H., Gothard, S., Mattek, N., Wright, K., Barnes, L. L., Silbert, L. C., Lim, M. M., Kaye, J. A., & Beattie, Z.
- Affiliations
- Oregon Health & Science University (US)
- Rush University Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wu, Chao-Yi
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2021-10-05
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2077-2084
- ISSN
- 1079-5006 (ISSN-L)
- 1758-535X
- PMC
- PMC9536445
- OpenAlex
- W3204519489
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 2.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- The Journals of Gerontology Series A (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (P30AG024978, R01AG024059, P30-AG008017, U2C AG054397, RF1AG22018, P3010161, R01AG17917, P30AG066518-01, P30AG024978-15, P30AG066518-02)
- Department of Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development (IIR 17-144)
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL1 TR002369, KL2TR002370)
- National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (KL2TR002370)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
- Social Sciences › Transportation › Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
- Keywords
- mild cognitive impairment, unobtrusive sensing, diurnal activity patterns, kitchen activities, elderly living alone, passive infrared motion sensor, spatiotemporal behavior
- MeSH terms
- Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Humans, Technology, Cognitive Dysfunction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review