Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 477

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Red Cell Distribution Width and Mortality in Older Adults: A Meta-analysis

Open access
Patel, K. V., Semba, R. D., Ferrucci, L., Newman, A. B., Fried, L. P., Wallace, R. B., Bandinelli, S., Phillips, C. S., Yu, B., Connelly, S., Shlipak, M. G., Chaves, P. H. M., Launer, L. J., Ershler, W. B., Harris, T. B., Longo, D. L., Guralnik, J. M.·2010·The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Red cell distribution width (RDW) is a quantitative measure of variability in the size of circulating erythrocytes with higher values reflecting greater heterogeneity in cell sizes. Recent studies have shown that higher RDW is associated with increased mortality risk in patients with clinically significant cardiovascular disease (CVD). Whether RDW is prognostic in more representative community-based populations is unclear. METHODS: Seven relevant community-based studies of older adults with RDW measurement and mortality ascertainment were identified. Cox proportional hazards regression and meta-analysis on individual participant data were performed. RESULTS: Median RDW values varied across studies from 13.2% to 14.6%. During 68,822 person-years of follow-up of 11,827 older adults with RDW measured, there was a graded increased risk of death associated with higher RDW values (p < .001). For every 1% increment in RDW, total mortality risk increased by 14% (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11-1.17). In addition, RDW was strongly associated with deaths from CVD (adjusted HR: 1.15; 95% CI: 1.12-1.25), cancer (adjusted HR: 1.13; 95% CI: 1.07-1.20), and other causes (adjusted HR: 1.13; 95% CI: 1.07-1.18). Furthermore, the RDW-mortality association occurred in all major demographic, disease, and nutritional risk factor subgroups examined. Among the subset of 1,603 older adults without major age-associated diseases, RDW remained strongly associated with total mortality (adjusted HR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.21-1.44). CONCLUSIONS: RDW is a routinely reported test that is a powerful predictor of mortality in community-dwelling older adults with and without age-associated diseases. The biologic mechanisms underlying this association merit investigation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/gerona/glp163

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Cited by

See all 477

Metadata

Authors
Patel, K. V., Semba, R. D., Ferrucci, L., Newman, A. B., Fried, L. P., Wallace, R. B., Bandinelli, S., Phillips, C. S., Yu, B., Connelly, S., Shlipak, M. G., Chaves, P. H. M., Launer, L. J., Ershler, W. B., Harris, T. B., Longo, D. L., & Guralnik, J. M.
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
Published
2009-10-30
Volume
65A
Issue
3
Pages
258-265
ISSN
  • 1079-5006 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-535X
OpenAlex
W2097202055
Cited by
477
References
23
FWCI
1.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Red Cell Distribution Width and Mortality in Older Adults: A Meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/gerona/glp163
The paper
Patel, K. V., Semba, R. D., Ferrucci, L., Newman, A. B., Fried, L. P., Wallace, R. B., Bandinelli, S., Phillips, C. S., Yu, B., Connelly, S., Shlipak, M. G., Chaves, P. H. M., Launer, L. J., Ershler, W. B., Harris, T. B., Longo, D. L., & Guralnik, J. M. (2010). Red Cell Distribution Width and Mortality in Older Adults: A Meta-analysis. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glp163

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.