Cited by 34Chronic Disease Management StrategiesDiabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Treatment and Management

Clinical complexity and mortality in middle-aged and older adults with diabetes

Open access
Cigolle, C. T., Kabeto, M. U., Lee, P. G., Blaum, C. S.·2012·The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Middle-aged and older adults with diabetes are heterogeneous and may be characterized as belonging to one of three clinical groups: a relatively healthy group, a group having characteristics likely to make diabetes self-management difficult, and a group with poor health status for whom current management targets have uncertain benefit. METHODS: We analyzed waves 2004-2008 of the Health and Retirement Study and the supplemental Health and Retirement Study 2003 Diabetes Study. The sample included adults with diabetes 51 years and older (n = 3,507, representing 13.6 million in 2004). We investigated the mortality outcomes for the three clinical groups, using survival analysis and Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: The 5-year survival probabilities were Relatively Healthy Group, 90.8%; Self-Management Difficulty Group, 79.4%; and Uncertain Benefit Group, 52.5%. For all age groups and clinical groups, except those 76 years and older in the Uncertain Benefit Group, survival exceeded 50%. CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals the substantial survival of middle-aged and older adults with diabetes, regardless of health status. These findings have implications for the clinical management of and future research about diabetes patients with multiple comorbidities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/gerona/gls095

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Older adults with diabetes categorized as having complex or intermediate health are heterogeneous with respect to their function and life expectancy.

    “Older adults with diabetes categorized as having complex or intermediate health (Table 13.1) are heterogeneous with respect to their function and life expectancy (61)(62)(63).”

    From 13. Older Adults: <i>Standards of Care in Diabetes—2024</i> (2024) · cites this paper as [62]

    The Abstract describes adults with diabetes as heterogeneous across clinical groups, and the Results report different five-year survival probabilities for those groups. But the paper uses different group labels from “complex or intermediate health,” does not establish heterogeneity of function within those categories, and explicitly says its analyses examined survival and mortality, not life expectancy (Results; page unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Older adults with diabetes categorized as having complex or intermediate health are heterogeneous with respect to their function and life expectancy.

    “Older adults with diabetes categorized as having complex or intermediate health (Table 13.2) are still heterogeneous with respect to their function and life expectancy”

    From 13. Older Adults: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [70]

    The Abstract describes adults with diabetes as heterogeneous across clinical groups, and the Results report different five-year survival probabilities for those groups. But the paper does not establish variation in function and life expectancy within the cited complex or intermediate categories; it explicitly says its analyses examined survival and mortality, not life expectancy (Results; page unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Selvin E , Coresh J , Brancati FL . The burden and treatment of diabetes in elderly individuals in the U.S . Diabetes Care . 2006 ; 29 ( 11 ): 2415 -2419 .
  2. Suh DC , Kim CM , Choi IS , Plauschinat CA . Comorbid conditions and glycemic control in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mel- litus, 1988 to 1994 to 1999 to 2004 . J Am Geriatr Soc . 2008 ; 56 ( 3 ): 484 -492 .
  3. Feil DG , Zhu CW , Sultzer DL . The relationship between cognitive impairment and diabetes self-management in a population-based community sample of older adults with Type 2 diabetes . J Behav Med . 2012 ; 35 ( 2 ): 190 -199 .
  4. Blaum C , Cigolle CT , Boyd C , et al . Clinical complexity in middle- aged and older adults with diabetes: the Health and Retirement Study . Med Care . 2010 ; 48 ( 4 ): 327 -334 .
  5. Aron D , Pogach L . Transparency standards for diabetes performance measures . JAMA . 2009 ; 301 ( 2 ): 210 -212 .
  6. Pogach L , Aron DC . Sudden acceleration of diabetes quality measures . JAMA . 2011 ; 305 ( 7 ): 709 -710 .
  7. Pogach LM , Rajan M , Maney M , Tseng CL , Aron DC . Hidden complexities in assessment of glycemic outcomes: are quality rankings aligned with treatment? Diabetes Care . 2010 ; 33 ( 10 ): 2133 -2139 .
  8. Barnett KN , McMurdo MET , Ogston SA , Morris AD , Evans JMM . Mortality in people diagnosed with type 2 diabetes at an older age: a systematic review . Age and Ageing . 2006 ; 35 : 463 -468 .
  9. Juster FT , Suzman R . An overview of the health and retirement study . J Hum Resour . 1995 ; 30 : S7 -S56 .
  10. Soldo BJ , Hurd MD , Rodgers WL , Wallace RB . Asset and Health Dynamics Among the Oldest Old: An overview of the AHEAD study . J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci . 1997 ; 52 : 1 -20 .
  11. Heisler M , Faul JD , Hayward RA , Langa KM , Blaum C , Weir D . Mechanisms for racial and ethnic disparities in glycemic control in middle-aged and older Americans in the health and retirement study . Arch Intern Med . 2007 ; 167 ( 17 ): 1853 -1860 .
  12. Cigolle CT , Langa KM , Kabeto MU , Blaum CS . Setting eligibility criteria for a care-coordination benefi t . J Am Geriatr Soc . 2005 ; 53 ( 12 ): 2051 -2059 .
  13. Cigolle CT , Langa KM , Kabeto MU , Tian Z , Blaum CS . Geriatric con- ditions and disability: the Health and Retirement Study . Ann Intern Med . 2007 ; 147 ( 3 ): 156 -164 .
  14. Blaum CS , Ofstedal MB , Liang J . Low cognitive performance, comorbid disease, and task-specifi c disability: Findings from a nation- ally representative survey . J Gerontol Med Sci . Aug 2002 ; 57 ( 8 ): M523 -M531 .
  15. Herzog AR , Wallace RB . Measures of cognitive functioning in the AHEAD study . J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci . 1997 ; 52 : 37 -48 .

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cigolle, C. T., Kabeto, M. U., Lee, P. G., & Blaum, C. S.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
Published
2012-04-06
Volume
67
Issue
12
Pages
1313-1320
ISSN
  • 1079-5006 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-535X
OpenAlex
W2136432753
Cited by
34
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series A (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5k08ag031837-05)
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (1r24hs019459-01)
  • National Institute on Aging (U01 AG 09740, K08-AG-031837, 5K08AG031837, U01AG009740)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK092926)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
diabetes mellitus, mortality, middle-aged adults, older adults, clinical complexity, diabetes self-management, comorbidities, health status, survival, Health and Retirement Study
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Self Care, Comorbidity, Proportional Hazards Models, Diabetes Complications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review