The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Public Health Impact of Osteoporosis
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe the public health impact of osteoporosis including the magnitude of the problem and important consequences of osteoporotic fractures. METHODS: Literature review of key references selected by author. RESULTS: Current demographic trends leading to an increased number of individuals surviving past age 65 will result in an increased number of osteoporotic fractures. Important consequences of osteoporotic fractures include an increased mortality that for hip fractures extends to 10 years after the fracture. Increased mortality risk also extends to major and minor fractures, especially, in those over 75 years. Hip and vertebral fractures have important functional consequences and reductions in quality of life. The economic impact of osteoporotic fractures is large and growing. Significant health care resources are required for all fractures. CONCLUSIONS: To alleviate the public and private burden of osteoporosis related fractures, assessment of risk and reduction of individual risk is critical.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Incidence and Economic Burden of Osteoporosis-Related Fractures in the United States, 2005–2025
Burge, R., Dawson-Hughes, B., Solomon, D. H., Wong, J. B., King, A., & Tosteson, A. (2007) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1359/jbmr.061113 · Cited by 4,026
Cost-effective osteoporosis treatment thresholds: the United States perspective
Tosteson, A. N. A., Melton, L. J., Dawson-Hughes, B., Baim, S., Favus, M. J., Khosla, S., & Lindsay, R. L. (2008) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s00198-007-0550-6 · Cited by 441
LeBoff, M. S., Hawkes, W. G., Glowacki, J., Yu-Yahiro, J., Hurwitz, S., & Magaziner, J. (2008) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s00198-008-0582-6 · Cited by 136
Cited by
Romosozumab Treatment in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis
Cosman, F., Crittenden, D. B., Adachi, J. D., Binkley, N., Czerwinski, E., Ferrari, S., Hofbauer, L. C., Lau, E., Lewiecki, E. M., Miyauchi, A., et al. (2016) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1607948 · Cited by 1,805
Chesi, A., Wagley, Y., Johnson, M. E., Manduchi, E., Su, C., Lu, S., Leonard, M. E., Hodge, K. M., Pippin, J. A., Hankenson, K. D., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09302-x · Cited by 158
Effects of TZD use and discontinuation on fracture rates in ACCORD bone study
Schwartz, A. V., Chen, H., Ambrosius, W. T., Sood, A., Josse, R. G., Bonds, D. E., Schnall, A. M., Vittinghoff, E., Bauer, D. C., Banerji, M. A., et al. (2015) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2015-1215 · Cited by 85
Areal and volumetric bone mineral density and risk of multiple types of fracture in older men
Chalhoub, D., Orwoll, E. S., Cawthon, P. M., Ensrud, K. E., Boudreau, R., Greenspan, S., Newman, A. B., Zmuda, J., Bauer, D., Cummings, S., et al. (2016) · Bone · doi:10.1016/j.bone.2016.08.014 · Cited by 54
Self-citationLin, W., Li, Y., Qiu, C., Zou, B., Gong, Y., Zhang, X., Tian, D., Sherman, W., Sanchez, F., Wu, D., et al. (2025) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkae1298 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Cauley, J. A.
- Venue
- The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-07-31
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1243-1251
- ISSN
- 1079-5006 (ISSN-L)
- 1758-535X
- OpenAlex
- W2128226103
- Cited by
- 513
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 30.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
