Cited by 248Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk ManagementAging, Health, and DisabilityHealth disparities and outcomes

Differentials in Active Life Expectancy in the Older Population of the United States

Crimmins, E. M., Hayward, M. D., Saito, Y.·1996·The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences

Abstract

This study clarifies the process by which mortality and disability interact to determine differences in active life expectancy by age, sex, race, and education for the U.S. population 70 years of age and over. The analysis is performed using data from the Longitudinal Study of Aging and multistate life tables constructed using the results of hazard models. Women spend more years than men both active and inactive at every age; however, the proportion of life that is expected to be active is smaller for women. These differences are largely due to mortality differences favoring women. Persons with less than a high school education have shorter total and active life expectancies but similar expected lengths of inactive life compared to those with more than a high school education. There are no significant race differences in total life expectancy for race-education groups of the older population; but Blacks have lower expected active life than non-Blacks because of worse functioning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geronb/51b.3.s111

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crimmins, E. M., Hayward, M. D., & Saito, Y.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • Nihon University (JP)
Corresponding author
Crimmins, E. M.
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Published
1996-05-01
Volume
51B
Issue
3
Pages
S111-S120
ISSN
  • 1079-5014 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5368
OpenAlex
W2074202553
Cited by
248
References
1
Citations by year
2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 7
FWCI
26.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Agence Nationale pour le Développement de la Recherche Universitaire
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG011758, R01AG011235)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
active life expectancy, older adults, sex differences, racial differences, educational attainment, disability, mortality, multistate life tables, Longitudinal Study of Aging, women's health, Black older adults
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, Educational Status, Female, Persons with Disabilities, Humans, Life Expectancy, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Mortality, Quality of Life, Retrospective Studies, Sex Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Racial Groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review