Cited by 110Aging and Gerontology ResearchAging, Health, and DisabilityHealth, psychology, and well-being

Control striving in older adults with serious health problems: A 9-year longitudinal study of survival, health, and well-being.

Hall, Nathan C., Chipperfield, Judith G., Heckhausen, Jutta, Perry, Raymond P.·2010·Psychology and Aging

Abstract

The present longitudinal study of 143 older adults (73-98 years) with serious health problems (arthritis, heart disease, heart attack, stroke) examined the effects of goal engagement, disengagement, and self-protection control strategies on self-rated physical health (condition severity, functional status) and subjective well-being (life satisfaction) at 5 years and survival at 9 years. Main effects and interactions between strategy use and the occurrence of an acute vascular event (no, yes) as well as age (young-old vs. old-old) were assessed. As hypothesized, goal engagement predicted greater survival for individuals with acute conditions but poorer physical health for those with chronic conditions and among old-old adults. In contrast, goal disengagement predicted poorer physical health for those with acute conditions but better health for individuals with chronic conditions and old-old adults. Self-protective strategies (positive reappraisal) predicted greater survival, health, and subjective well-being for those with acute conditions, as well as better physical health for old-old adults.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0019278

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hall, N. C., Chipperfield, J. G., Heckhausen, J., & Perry, R. P.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Hall, Nathan C.
Venue
Psychology and Aging
Published
2010
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
432-445
ISSN
  • 0882-7974 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1498
OpenAlex
W2170665778
Cited by
110
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 14
FWCI
9.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychology and Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (510-2002-0059; 410-2007- 2225)
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (SSC-42790)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, psychology, and well-being
Keywords
older adults, goal engagement, goal disengagement, self-protection strategies, positive reappraisal, survival, self-rated physical health, functional status, subjective well-being, life satisfaction, acute vascular events, chronic disease, oldest old, young-old
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adaptation, Psychological, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cerebral Infarction, Chronic Disease, Female, Goals, Humans, Individuality, Internal-External Control, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Motivation, Quality of Life, Sick Role

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review