CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 264Aging and Gerontology ResearchHealth disparities and outcomesAging, Health, and Disability

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 86 of the 86 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of Positive and Negative Social Exchanges with Various Sources on Depressive Symptoms in Younger and Older Adults

Okun, M. A., Keith, V. M.·1998·The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
DOI 10.1093/geronb/53b.1.p4
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Addressing a previous gap in the gerontological literature, the present study examined the effects of both positive and negative social exchanges within key relationships (spouse, children, and other relatives/friends) on the depressive symptoms of younger (28 to 59 years old) and older (60 to 92 years old) men and women. Separate analyses were carried out on younger adults (N = 452) and older adults (N = 849) who were respondents in the Americans' Changing Lives study. In both age groups, positive and negative social exchanges with the same source were significantly (p < .001), inversely related (rs range from -.23 to -.43); and positive social exchanges exerted stronger net effects on depressive symptoms than negative social exchanges. For older adults, some buffering effects were found when negative and positive social exchanges were associated with different sources; for younger adults, buffering effects were found when negative and positive social exchanges were associated with the same source. These buffering effects were not conditioned by gender. The findings of the present study highlight the importance of taking into account the age of the recipient and the provider-recipient relationship when studying the joint influence of negative and positive social exchanges on adults' depressive symptoms.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geronb/53b.1.p4

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 264

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Okun, M. A., & Keith, V. M.
Affiliations
Arizona State University (US)
Corresponding author
Okun, M. A.
ORCID
Keith, V. M.
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
1998-01-01
Volume
53B
Issue
1
Pages
P4-P20
ISSN
  • 1079-5014 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5368
DOI
10.1093/geronb/53b.1.p4
OpenAlex
W2169037888
Cited by
264
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
FWCI
14.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
Keywords
depressive symptoms, social exchange theory, buffering effect, age differences, older adults, young adults, marital relationships, parent-child relationship, family and friends, gender differences
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Sex Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review