Cited by 57Health and Wellbeing ResearchAging, Health, and DisabilityHealth disparities and outcomes

Perceived Control as a Buffer in the Use of Health Care Services

Chipperfield, J. G., Greenslade, L.·1999·The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences

Abstract

Gerontologists are increasingly interested in the notion of perceived personal control because such perceptions can be threatened by age-related changes such as declining health and the loss of loved ones. Although a great deal is known about the central role of perceived control in healthy, successful aging, less is known about its potential role in specific contexts such as the use of health services. Our study examined the link between perceived control and patterns of health service use among older individuals with arthritis. We assessed perceived control during an interview, using both a domain-specific and a global measure, and considered health service use in the subsequent year. Even after statistically adjusting for age and morbidity, individuals who perceived low levels of control subsequently were found to use more health services than their high-control counterparts; they visited their physicians more often, had more laboratory tests, and stayed longer in the hospital. This was true, however, only for individuals who had also reported that their arthritis restricted the things they were able to do. Various interpretations are considered, including the possibility that patients with low perceived control are inefficient users of health services or that patients with high perceived control experience a deficiency in health care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geronb/54b.3.p146

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chipperfield, J. G., & Greenslade, L.
Affiliations
University of Manitoba (CA)
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Published
1999-05-01
Volume
54B
Issue
3
Pages
P146-P154
ISSN
  • 1079-5014 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5368
OpenAlex
W2103719797
Cited by
57
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
6.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • Manitoba Health Research Council
  • Research Manitoba
  • School of Medicine, Stanford University
  • Medical Research Council
  • NIH Clinical Center
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Wellbeing Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
perceived control, health care utilization, older adults, arthritis, aging, physician visits, laboratory testing, hospitalization, functional limitations, buffer hypothesis
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Arthritis, Female, Freedom, Geriatrics, Health Services, Humans, Male, Quality of Life, Self Concept

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review