Cited by 87Aging and Gerontology ResearchCognitive Abilities and TestingDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Aging, Cohorts, and Verbal Ability

Alwin, Duane F., McCammon, Ryan J.·2001·The Journals of Gerontology: Series B

Abstract

Objectives Age-related differences in cognitive abilities observed in cross-sectional samples of individuals varying in age may in part be spurious due to the effects of cohort differences in schooling and related factors. This study examined the effects of aging on cognitive function controlling for any and all differences in cohort-based social experiences of different age groups. Methods We examined age-related patterns in a measure of verbal ability using 14 repeated cross-sectional surveys from the General Social Survey (GSS) over a 24-year period. Results The raw GSS data show the expected age-related growth and decline in vocabulary knowledge, but these age differences are reduced when adjusted for cohort differences. There is evidence of small age-related patterns in vocabulary knowledge within cohorts, but the curvilinear contributions of aging to variation in verbal scores account for less than one-third of 1% of the variance in vocabulary knowledge, once cohort is controlled. Cohort differences in schooling contribute substantially to this effect. Discussion Within-age-group variation in vocabulary knowledge is vastly more important than age differences per se, and the complexities of the relationship of verbal skills to historical differences in the experience of schooling present an interesting avenue for future research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geronb/56.3.s151

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Historical increases in the quantity of educational attainment during the 20th century are a major factor underlying cognitive cohort differences.

    “Our rationale was that historical increases in the quantity of educational attainment during the 20th century are a major factor underlying cognitive cohort differences (Alwin & McCammon, 2001; Hauser & Huang, 1997; Rönnlund et al., 2005).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alwin, D. F., & McCammon, R. J.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology: Series B
Published
2001-05-01
Volume
56
Issue
3
Pages
S151-S161
ISSN
  • 1079-5014 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5368
OpenAlex
W2110264528
Cited by
87
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (AG-04743-08, AG-015437-02, R01AG015437)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
aging, cohort effects, verbal ability, vocabulary knowledge, cognitive decline, school education, General Social Survey
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Cross-Sectional Studies, Educational Status, Health Surveys, Humans, Language Tests, Middle Aged, Regression Analysis, Verbal Behavior, Vocabulary, Cohort Studies, Geriatric Assessment, Cohort Effect

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review