Aging, Cohorts, and Verbal Ability
Abstract
Objectives Age-related differences in cognitive abilities observed in cross-sectional samples of individuals varying in age may in part be spurious due to the effects of cohort differences in schooling and related factors. This study examined the effects of aging on cognitive function controlling for any and all differences in cohort-based social experiences of different age groups. Methods We examined age-related patterns in a measure of verbal ability using 14 repeated cross-sectional surveys from the General Social Survey (GSS) over a 24-year period. Results The raw GSS data show the expected age-related growth and decline in vocabulary knowledge, but these age differences are reduced when adjusted for cohort differences. There is evidence of small age-related patterns in vocabulary knowledge within cohorts, but the curvilinear contributions of aging to variation in verbal scores account for less than one-third of 1% of the variance in vocabulary knowledge, once cohort is controlled. Cohort differences in schooling contribute substantially to this effect. Discussion Within-age-group variation in vocabulary knowledge is vastly more important than age differences per se, and the complexities of the relationship of verbal skills to historical differences in the experience of schooling present an interesting avenue for future research.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Historical increases in the quantity of educational attainment during the 20th century are a major factor underlying cognitive cohort differences.
“Our rationale was that historical increases in the quantity of educational attainment during the 20th century are a major factor underlying cognitive cohort differences (Alwin & McCammon, 2001; Hauser & Huang, 1997; Rönnlund et al., 2005).”
From Cohort differences in cognitive aging and terminal decline in the Seattle Longitudinal Study. (2011) · cites this paper as Alwin & McCammon, 2001
Cites
The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition
Salthouse, T. A. (1996) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.103.3.403 · Cited by 5,568 · cited 1× · see citing works
“At the same time, there is also evidence of declines in perceptual speed and memory in old age, and recent evidence suggests that declines in measures of cognitive performance in the older age ranges are probably linked to declines in processing and sensory abilities (Salthouse, 1996).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Link, B. G., Phelan, J. C., Miech, R., & Westin, E. L. (2008) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.1177/002214650804900106 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Cohort differences in cognitive aging and terminal decline in the Seattle Longitudinal Study.
Gerstorf, D., Ram, N., Hoppmann, C., Willis, S. L., & Schaie, K. W. (2011) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0023426 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
An Historical Framework for Cohort Differences in Intelligence
Schaie, K. W., Willis, S. L., & Pennak, S. (2005) · Research in Human Development · doi:10.1080/15427609.2005.9683344 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
- Authors
- Alwin, D. F., & McCammon, R. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- ORCID
- McCammon, Ryan J.
- Venue
- The Journals of Gerontology: Series B
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-05-01
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- S151-S161
- ISSN
- 1079-5014 (ISSN-L)
- 1758-5368
- OpenAlex
- W2110264528
- Cited by
- 87
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journals of Gerontology Series B (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (AG-04743-08, AG-015437-02, R01AG015437)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Keywords
- aging, cohort effects, verbal ability, vocabulary knowledge, cognitive decline, school education, General Social Survey
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Cross-Sectional Studies, Educational Status, Health Surveys, Humans, Language Tests, Middle Aged, Regression Analysis, Verbal Behavior, Vocabulary, Cohort Studies, Geriatric Assessment, Cohort Effect
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review