The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Persistent, Consistent, Widespread, and Robust? Another Look at Recent Trends in Old-Age Disability
Abstract
Objective The purpose of this study was to provide new evidence on disability trends among elderly persons from 1982 to 1996. Methods The sample includes 124,949 participants aged 70 and older in the 1982-1996 National Health Interview Surveys. Logistic analysis was used to estimate the trend in disability prevalence after controlling for various sociodemographic factors. Results We found that: (a) the prevalence of disability has declined, but the gains did not persist throughout the entire period or accelerate over time; (b) only routine care disability has declined, whereas more severe personal care disability shows no improvements; (c) estimates are robust to the exclusion of the nursing home population but may be sensitive to growth in the assisted living population; (d) estimates of decline in disability prevalence are fairly consistent across five national surveys; (e) gains have been concentrated among the most educated elderly persons; and (f) gains in education appear to be an important confounder of the improvements. Discussion Evidence from several surveys using various measures indicates that disability has declined among elderly persons. Determining the causes of the improvements should be a high priority in future research efforts.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“There have also been fairly consistent reports of decreases in recent disability prevalence both in the United States and in some other countries (Manton, Gu, & Lamb, 2006; Manton, Stallard, & Corder, 1995; Schoeni et al., 2001; Spiers, Jagger, & Clarke, 1996).”
From Mortality and Morbidity Trends: Is There Compression of Morbidity? (2011) · cites this paper as Schoeni et al., 2001
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Relationship Between Education and Health: Reducing Disparities Through a Contextual Approach
Zajacova, A., & Lawrence, E. M. (2018) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044628 · Cited by 1,205
Mortality and Morbidity Trends: Is There Compression of Morbidity?
Crimmins, E. M., & Beltran-Sanchez, H. (2011) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences · doi:10.1093/geronb/gbq088 · Cited by 694
Health, life expectancy, and health care spending among the elderly
Lubitz, J., Cai, L., Kramarow, E., & Lentzner, H. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa020614 · Cited by 513
The 2030 Problem: Caring for Aging Baby Boomers
Knickman, J. R., & Snell, E. K. (2002) · Health Services Research · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0560.2002.56.x · Cited by 510
The changing relationship of obesity and disability, 1988–2004
Alley, D. E., & Chang, V. W. (2007) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.298.17.2020 · Cited by 414
Looking Forward to a General Theory on Population Aging
Robine, J.-M., & Michel, J.-P. (2004) · The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences · doi:10.1093/gerona/59.6.m590 · Cited by 272
Metadata
- Authors
- Schoeni, R. F., Freedman, V. A., & Wallace, R. B.
- Venue
- The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-07-01
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- S206-S218
- ISSN
- 1079-5014
- 1758-5368
- Cited by
- 120
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review