Cited by 199Health disparities and outcomesAging and Gerontology ResearchRetirement, Disability, and Employment

Socioeconomic Status and Age Identity: The Role of Dimensions of Health in the Subjective Construction of Age

Barrett, A. E.·2003·The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study examines health inequality as a potential explanation for socioeconomic differences in age identity. The following dimensions of health are examined: comparative self-rated health, self-assessed changes in physiological well-being, prospective self-rated health, perceived control over health, chronic conditions, and parents' health. Components of health also are explored as possible mediators of age differences in the effect of socioeconomic status on age identity. METHODS: Using the National Survey of Midlife Development in the United States, ordinary least squares regression models of age identity are estimated for a representative sample of the noninstitutionalized U.S. population between the ages of 25 and 74 (n = 2,864). RESULTS: The older identities held by the less socioeconomically advantaged are explained by their worse health, particularly their less favorable predictions of future health, compared with their wealthier peers. Differences in age identity by education and perceived financial well-being are greatest among older adults; however, health only partially accounts for these age patterns. DISCUSSION: This study reveals that health inequalities shape the subjective experience of aging. Further work using longitudinal data is needed to determine the precise causal pathways linking socioeconomic status, health, and age identity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geronb/58.2.s101

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Various factors shape age identity.

    “This area of scholarship also illuminates numerous other factors, such as gender, race, class, health, and social relationships, that shape age identity”

    From Centering Age Inequality: Developing a Sociology-of-Age Framework (2022) · cites this paper as Barrett 2003

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barrett, A. E.
Affiliations
Florida State University (US)
Corresponding author
Barrett, A. E.
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Published
2003-03-01
Volume
58
Issue
2
Pages
S101-S109
ISSN
  • 1079-5014 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5368
OpenAlex
W2109807760
Cited by
199
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Retirement, Disability, and Employment
Keywords
age identity, socioeconomic status, health disparities, self-rated health, perceived control over health, chronic disease, parental health, subjective aging, age differences, financial well-being, older adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aging, Chronic Disease, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Social Class

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review