Cited by 128Retirement, Disability, and EmploymentFinancial Literacy, Pension, Retirement AnalysisAging and Gerontology Research

Why Do Boomers Plan to Work Longer?

Mermin, G. B. T., Johnson, R. W., Murphy, D. P.·2007·The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences

Abstract

Objective . Recent changes in retirement trends and patterns have raised questions about the likely retirement behavior of baby boomers, the large cohort born between 1946 and 1964. This study examined recent changes in retirement expectations and the factors that drove them. Methods Using data from the Health and Retirement Study, the analysis compared self-reported probabilities of working full time past ages 62 and 65 among workers aged 51 to 56 in 1992 and 2004. The study modeled retirement expectations for both generations and used the estimated regression coefficients to identify the forces that accounted for generational differences. Results . Between 1992 and 2004, the mean self-reported probability of working full time past age 65 among workers aged 51 to 56 increased from 27% to 33%. Lower rates of retiree health insurance offers from employers, higher levels of educational attainment, and lower rates of defined benefit pension coverage accounted for most of the growth. Discussion Given the continued erosion in employer-sponsored retiree health benefits and defined benefit pension plans, boomers will likely remain at work longer than members of the previous generation. Lengthier careers will likely promote economic growth, increase government revenue, and improve individual financial security at older ages.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geronb/62.5.s286

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mermin, G. B. T., Johnson, R. W., & Murphy, D. P.
Affiliations
Urban Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Mermin, G. B. T.
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Published
2007-09-01
Volume
62
Issue
5
Pages
S286-S294
ISSN
  • 1079-5014 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5368
OpenAlex
W2149942982
Cited by
128
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 8
FWCI
20.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Social Security Administration
  • Center for Retirement Research, Boston College
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Retirement, Disability, and Employment
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
baby boomers, retirement expectations, retirement age, older workers, full-time employment, retiree health insurance, defined benefit pensions, educational attainment, employer-provided benefits, generational differences
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, Decision Making, Employment, Female, Humans, Income, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Theoretical, Pensions, Population Growth, Regression Analysis, Retirement, United States, Intention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review