Cited by 135Aging and Gerontology ResearchAging, Health, and DisabilityRetirement, Disability, and Employment

Contributing to Others, Contributing to Oneself: Perceptions of Generativity and Health in Later Life

Open access
Gruenewald, T. L., Liao, D. H., Seeman, T. E.·2012·The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences

Abstract

Objectives To examine whether perceptions of generativity predict the likelihood of increases in levels of impairment in activities of daily living (ADLs) or of dying over a 10-year period in older adults aged 60-75 from the Study of Midlife in the United States (MIDUS). Method Perceptions of generativity and current generative contributions as well as select sociodemographic, health status, health behavior, and psychosocial factors, assessed at a baseline exam, were examined as predictors of change in ADL disability level or mortality over the 10-year period between the baseline and follow-up waves of the MIDUS Study. Results Greater levels of generativity and generative contributions at baseline predicted lower odds of experiencing increases in ADL disability (2 or more new domains of impairment; generativity odds ratio [OR] = 0.93 and generative contributions OR = 0.87), or of dying (generativity OR = 0.94 and generative contributions OR = 0.88), over the 10-year follow-up in models adjusted for sociodemographics and baseline health and disability. Associations remained relatively unchanged with the inclusion of different sets of health behavior and psychosocial variables in analytic models. Discussion Findings indicate that greater perceptions of generativity are associated with more favorable trajectories of physical functioning and longevity over time in older adults.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geronb/gbs034

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Generativity may be important for understanding grandparenting and social connection for older adults in a global context, particularly as it may have relevance to the health of older adults.

    “Generativity may be important for under-standing grandparenting and social connection for older adults in a global context, particularly as it may have relevance to the health of older adults (Gruenewald et al., 2012; Maselko et al., 2014; Warburton et al., 2006).”
  • The Midlife in the United States Study demonstrated that generativity lowered older adults' risk of experiencing functional limitations and mortality over a 10-year period.

    “Moreover, the Midlife in the United States Study demonstrated that generativity lowered older adults’ risk of experiencing functional limitations and mortality over a 10-year period (Gruenewald et al., 2012).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gruenewald, T. L., Liao, D. H., & Seeman, T. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Published
2012-03-27
Volume
67
Issue
6
Pages
660-665
ISSN
  • 1079-5014 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5368
OpenAlex
W2116903059
Cited by
135
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
9.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ag032271-02)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01-AG-032271, K01AG028582, P01AG020166)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Retirement, Disability, and Employment
Keywords
generativity, activities of daily living, functional disability, mortality, older adults, physical function, longevity, psychosocial factors, health behavior
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Altruism, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Status, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personal Satisfaction, Self Concept, Social Identification, Social Values, United States, Intergenerational Relations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review