Cited by 393Tactile and Sensory InteractionsAging and Gerontology ResearchPain Mechanisms and Treatments

Somesthetic Sensitivity in Young and Elderly Humans

Kenshalo, D. R.·1986·Journal of Gerontology

Abstract

Absolute thresholds were measured on 27 young (ages 19 to 31) and 21 elderly (ages 55 to 84) humans to six modes of cutaneous stimulation (single ramp-and-hold skin indentations--tactile, vibration at 40 and 250 Hz, temperature increases and decreases, and noxious heat) at two sites, the thenar eminence and the plantar foot. Comparisons of the elderly and young groups showed that elderly persons were significantly, p less than or equal to .001, less sensitive than young individuals to mechanical stimuli (tactile and vibration) at both sites. No significant differences were found in thresholds to thermal stimuli (warm-, cold-, and heat-pain) at either site except elderly feet were significantly, p less than or equal to .001, less sensitive than young feet to warm stimuli. Thresholds of elderly individuals were compared with the young group thresholds for deficits in sensitivity. All elderly participants showed deficits to one or more of the stimulus modes at one or the other site. There were significantly, p less than or equal to 0.01, more deficits to mechanical than to thermal stimuli. There was no increase in the frequency of deficits with increasing age.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geronj/41.6.732

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The decline in touch sensitivity is more severe for the lower extremities.

    “this decline is more severe for the lower extremities (Kenshalo, 1986; Lin et al., 2005)”

    From Design Principles to Accommodate Older Adults (2012) · cites this paper as Kenshalo, 1986

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kenshalo, D. R.
Affiliations
Florida State University (US)
Corresponding author
Kenshalo, D. R.
Venue
Journal of Gerontology
Published
1986-11-01
Volume
41
Issue
6
Pages
732-742
ISSN
0022-1422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2166620045
Cited by
393
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 12
FWCI
1.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Gerontology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (AG02085)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
aging, absolute threshold, tactile perception, vibration perception, thermal sensation, thermal pain, skin indentation, thenar eminence, plantar foot, cutaneous stimulation
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Cold Temperature, Female, Foot, Hand, Hot Temperature, Humans, Male, Mechanoreceptors, Middle Aged, Physical Stimulation, Sensation, Sensory Thresholds, Sex Factors, Thermosensing, Touch, Vibration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review