The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Age Differences in Decision Making: A Process Methodology for Examining Strategic Information Processing
Abstract
This study explored the use of process tracing techniques in examining the decision-making processes of older and younger adults. Thirty-six college-age and thirty-six retirement-age participants decided which one of six cars they would purchase on the basis of computer-accessed data. They provided information search protocols. Results indicate that total time to reach a decision did not differ according to age. However, retirement-age participants used less information, spent more time viewing, and re-viewed fewer bits of information than college-age participants. Information search patterns differed markedly between age groups. Patterns of retirement-age adults indicated their use of noncompensatory decision rules which, according to decision-making literature (Payne, 1976), reduce cognitive processing demands. The patterns of the college-age adults indicated their use of compensatory decision rules, which have higher processing demands.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Individual differences in adult decision-making competence.
Bruine de Bruin, W., Parker, A. M., & Fischhoff, B. (2007) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.5.938 · Cited by 906
“Furthermore, older adults may be more likely than younger ones to be overconfident (Crawford & Stankov, 1996; Job, 1990) and use simple noncompensatory choice strategies (Johnson, 1990).”
BackgroundGoal-directed memory: The role of cognitive control in older adults' emotional memory.
Mather, M., & Knight, M. (2005) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.20.4.554 · Cited by 613
The aging decision maker: Cognitive aging and the adaptive selection of decision strategies.
Mata, R., Schooler, L. J., & Rieskamp, J. (2007) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.22.4.796 · Cited by 366
Repeat Purchasing of New Automobiles by Older Consumers: Empirical Evidence and Interpretations
Lambert-Pandraud, R., Laurent, G., & Lapersonne, E. (2005) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.69.2.97.60757 · Cited by 320
Explaining adult age differences in decision‐making competence
Bruine de Bruin, W., Parker, A. M., & Fischhoff, B. (2012) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.712 · Cited by 264
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnson, M. M. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Gerontology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1990-03-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- P75-P78
- ISSN
- 0022-1422 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2110986246
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Age Differences in Decision Making: A Process Methodology for Examining Strategic Information Processing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/geronj/45.2.p75
- The paper
- Johnson, M. M. S. (1990). Age Differences in Decision Making: A Process Methodology for Examining Strategic Information Processing. Journal of Gerontology. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/45.2.p75
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.