The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Falls Efficacy as a Measure of Fear of Falling
Abstract
We developed the Falls Efficacy Scale (FES), an instrument to measure fear of falling, based on the operational definition of this fear as "low perceived self-efficacy at avoiding falls during essential, nonhazardous activities of daily living." The reliability and validity of the FES were assessed in two samples of community-living elderly persons. The FES showed good test-retest reliability (Pearson's correlation 0.71). Subjects who reported avoiding activities because of fear of falling had higher FES scores, representing lower self-efficacy or confidence, than subjects not reporting fear of falling. The independent predictors of FES score were usual walking pace (a measure of physical ability), anxiety, and depression. The FES appears to be a reliable and valid method for measuring fear of falling. This instrument may be useful in assessing the independent contribution of fear of falling to functional decline among elderly people.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
World guidelines for falls prevention and management for older adults: a global initiative
Montero-Odasso, M., van der Velde, N., Martin, F. C., Petrovic, M., Tan, M. P., Ryg, J., Aguilar-Navarro, S., Alexander, N. B., Becker, C., Blain, H., et al. (2022) · Age and Ageing · doi:10.1093/ageing/afac205 · Cited by 1,756
Wolf, S. L., Barnhart, H. X., Kutner, N. G., McNeely, E., Coogler, C., Xu, T., & Atlanta FICSIT Group (1996) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1996.tb01432.x · Cited by 1,142
Using psychometric techniques to improve the Balance Evaluation Systems Test: the mini-BESTest
Franchignoni, F., Horak, F., Godi, M., Nardone, A., & Giordano, A. (2010) · Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine · doi:10.2340/16501977-0537 · Cited by 1,081
Friedman, S. M., Munoz, B., West, S. K., Rubin, G. S., & Fried, L. P. (2002) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50352.x · Cited by 1,050
The relationship between leg power and physical performance in mobility-limited older people
Md, J. F. B., Kiely, D. K., Herman, S., Leveille, S. G., Mizer, K., Frontera, W. R., & Fielding, R. A. (2002) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50111.x · Cited by 605
Metadata
- Authors
- Tinetti, M. E., Richman, D., & Powell, L.
- Venue
- Journal of Gerontology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1990-11-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- P239-P243
- ISSN
- 0022-1422 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2104085366
- Cited by
- 2,070
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Falls Efficacy as a Measure of Fear of Falling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/geronj/45.6.p239
- The paper
- Tinetti, M. E., Richman, D., & Powell, L. (1990). Falls Efficacy as a Measure of Fear of Falling. Journal of Gerontology. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/45.6.p239
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
